Occurrence, source tracking and removal of antibiotics in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) in southern China

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2022-12, Vol.324, p.116311-116311, Article 116311
• Main Authors: Shi, Bao-shan, Cheng, Xiang-ju, Chen, Hong-zhan, Xie, Jun, Zhou, Zhi-hong, Jiang, Shen-qiong, Peng, Xiao-ming, Zhang, Yu-da, Zhu, Dan-tong, Lu, Zhuo-yin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Cross-contamination; Potential source; Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS)
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116311

The recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) has attracted much attention in China as a way to rapidly transform and upgrade aquaculture ponds to realize zero-emissions of pollutants in aquaculture tail water. Tail water purification ponds (TWPPs) play an important role in the treatment of aquaculture wastewater. However, until now, there have been few reports on the occurrence of antibiotics in RAS and the removal of antibiotics from the TWPPs of RAS. Therefore, this study focused on the occurrence of antibiotics in a typical ecological RAS. For comparison, the same measurements were simultaneously carried out in nearby open aquaculture ponds and rivers. The pollution level and spatial distribution of antibiotics in the RAS and the removal of antibiotics in the TWPPs were explored. The results showed that (1) eleven and twelve antibiotics were detected in water and sediment samples in the RAS, respectively, but no antibiotics were found in fish muscles and feed. Erythromycin (ERY), lincomycin (LIN), and ciprofloxacin (CFX) were the three main types of antibiotics found in water and sediment samples. (2) The TWPPs of the RAS can effectively remove antibiotics in aquaculture water. The antibiotic concentration in recirculating aquaculture ponds of the RAS was as high as 180 ng/L. After treatments in the TWPPs, the antibiotic concentration of aquaculture water decreased to 81.6 ng/L (3) The antibiotic concentrations in recirculating aquaculture ponds (25.2–180 ng/L) were lower than those in the nearby open aquaculture ponds (126–267.3 ng/L), and the concentration of antibiotics in the sediments of recirculating aquaculture ponds was up to 22.9 ng/g, while that in TWPPs was as high as 56.1 ng/g. In conclusion, the antibiotic residues in the RAS were low after antibiotics were banned in feed in China, and the removal of antibiotics in the TWPPs was more pronounced. Furthermore, cross-contamination was found between the RAS, surrounding open aquaculture ponds and the river, and the water supply of the RAS was likely to be the main contributor of antibiotics in the aquaculture environments. This study can help the government formulate discharge standards for antibiotics in aquaculture and also provide a reference for the transformation and upgrading of aquaculture ponds to achieve a zero-emission aquaculture mode. •Antibiotic concentration was the lowest for recirculating aquaculture ponds.•Water supply was main source for antibiotics in recirculating aquaculture