Clinical commissioning of an adaptive radiotherapy platform: Results and recommendations

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2022-12, Vol.23 (12), p.e13801-n/a
• Main Authors: Kisling, Kelly, Keiper, Timothy D., Branco, Daniela, Kim, Grace Gwe‐Ya, Moore, Kevin L, Ray, Xenia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT; Clinics; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods; ethos; Humans; on‐table adaptation; Phantoms, Imaging; Planning; quality assurance; Radiation therapy; Radiometry; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods; Registration; synthetic CT; Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; workflow
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13801

Online adaptive radiotherapy platforms present a unique challenge for commissioning as guidance is lacking and specialized adaptive equipment, such as deformable phantoms, are rare. We designed a novel adaptive commissioning process consisting of end‐to‐end tests using standard clinical resources. These tests were designed to simulate anatomical changes regularly observed at patient treatments. The test results will inform users of the magnitude of uncertainty from on‐treatment changes during the adaptive workflow and the limitations of their systems. We implemented these tests for the cone‐beam computed tomography (CT)‐based Varian Ethos online adaptive platform. Many adaptive platforms perform online dose calculation on a synthetic CT (synCT). To assess the impact of the synCT generation and online dose calculation on dosimetric accuracy, we conducted end‐to‐end tests using commonly available equipment: a CIRS IMRT Thorax phantom, PinPoint ionization chamber, Gafchromic film, and bolus. Four clinical scenarios were evaluated: weight gain and weight loss were simulated by adding and removing bolus, internal target shifts were simulated by editing the CTV during the adaptive workflow to displace it, and changes in gas were simulated by removing and reinserting rods in varying phantom locations. The effect of overriding gas pockets during planning was also assessed. All point dose measurements agreed within 2.7% of the calculated dose, with one exception: a scenario simulating gas present in the planning CT, not overridden during planning, and dissipating at treatment. Relative film measurements passed gamma analysis (3%/3 mm criteria) for all scenarios. Our process validated the Ethos dose calculation for online adapted treatment plans. Based on our results, we made several recommendations for our clinical adaptive workflow. This commissioning process used commonly available equipment and, therefore, can be applied in other clinics for their respective online adaptive platforms.