Loading…

Far‐UVC Light at 222 nm is Showing Significant Potential to Safely and Efficiently Inactivate Airborne Pathogens in Occupied Indoor Locations

Far UVC light (UVC wavelengths below 235 nm) is a comparatively new modality with significant potential to safely and very efficiently inactivate airborne pathogens in occupied indoor locations. There are now significant accumulations of evidence both in terms of the safety of far‐UVC for direct exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Photochemistry and photobiology 2023-05, Vol.99 (3), p.1047-1050
Main Author: Brenner, David J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Far UVC light (UVC wavelengths below 235 nm) is a comparatively new modality with significant potential to safely and very efficiently inactivate airborne pathogens in occupied indoor locations. There are now significant accumulations of evidence both in terms of the safety of far‐UVC for direct exposure of occupied indoor locations, and in terms of its efficacy to markedly reduce the levels of active airborne pathogens This article reviews both the safety of far‐UVC, which has a clear mechanistic underpinning, and its efficacy, both in the laboratory and in full‐sized rooms. Highlighted is the paper by Ma et al. in this issue of Photochemistry and Photobiology which addresses the efficacy of far‐UVC light (in this case at 222 nm) against a broad spectrum of common pathogens including SARS‐CoV‐2 and influenza viruses. From their data, and based on our understanding of the largely random nature of UVC‐induced damage within the genome, far UVC would be expected to be effective against the next pandemic virus, if and when it emerges. Measured DNA damage in the epidermis of a human skin model exposed to 100 mJ cm−2 at different UVC wavelengths. Far‐UVC (wavelengths ≤235 nm) does not produce significant DNA damage (in this case cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer [CPD] damage) in the epidermis, because the epidermis is protected by the overlying stratum corneum dead‐cell layer. By contrast the same exposures of conventional germicidal UVC (≥240 nm) produce significant measured DNA damage in the epidermis, because these UVC wavelengths can penetrate the stratum corneum. From Scientific Reports 2018, 8, 2752.
ISSN:0031-8655
1751-1097
DOI:10.1111/php.13739