Loading…

Hormone replacement cycles are associated with a higher risk of hypertensive disorders: Retrospective cohort study in singleton and twin pregnancies

Objective To elaborate the associations of different cycle regimens (natural cycle [NC], stimulated cycle [SC], hormone replacement cycle [HRC]) on maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes after frozen–thawed embryo transfers (FET). Design Population‐based registry study. Setting Swiss IVF R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2023-03, Vol.130 (4), p.377-386
Main Authors: Pape, Janna, Levy, Jérémy, Wolff, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To elaborate the associations of different cycle regimens (natural cycle [NC], stimulated cycle [SC], hormone replacement cycle [HRC]) on maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes after frozen–thawed embryo transfers (FET). Design Population‐based registry study. Setting Swiss IVF Registry. Population or Sample Singleton (n = 4636) and twin (n = 544) live births after NC‐FET (n = 776), SC‐FET (n = 758) or HRC‐FET (n = 3646) registered from 2014 to 2019. Methods Fifteen pregnancy pathologies were modelled for singleton and twin pregnancies using mixed models adjusted for cycle regimen, delivery, fertilisation technique, chronic anovulation, age of mother and centre. Main outcome measures Maternal (vaginal bleeding, isolated arterial hypertension and pre‐eclampsia) and neonatal (gestational age, birthweight, mode of delivery) adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results In singleton pregnancies, the incidences of bleeding in first trimester, isolated hypertension and pre‐eclampsia were highest in HRC‐FET with doubled odds of bleeding in first trimester (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.23; 95% CI 1.33–3.75), isolated hypertension (aOR 2.50; 95% CI 1.02–6.12) and pre‐eclampsia (aOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.13–4.12) in HRC‐FET vs. NC‐FET and with doubled respectively sixfold odds of bleeding (aOR 2.08; 95% CI 1.03–4.21) and pre‐eclampsia (6.02; 95% CI 1.38–26.24) in HRC‐FET versus SC‐FET. In twin pregnancies, the incidence of pre‐eclampsia was highest in HRC‐FET with numerically higher odds of pre‐eclampsia in HRC‐FET versus NC‐FET and versus SC‐FET. Conclusions Our data implied the highest maternal risks of hypertensive disorders in HRC‐FET, therefore clinicians should prefer SC‐FET or NC‐FET if medically possible.
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17343