Loading…

Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Ultrasound Diagnosis on Infant Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Under Constrained Computational Resources

Objectives Ultrasound (US) is important for diagnosing infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, the accuracy of the diagnosis depends heavily on expertise. We aimed to develop a novel automatic system (DDHnet) for accurate, fast, and robust diagnosis of DDH. Methods An automatic sys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2023-06, Vol.42 (6), p.1235-1248
Main Authors: Huang, Bingxuan, Xia, Bei, Qian, Jikuan, Zhou, Xinrui, Zhou, Xu, Liu, Shengfeng, Chang, Ao, Yan, Zhongnuo, Tang, Zijian, Xu, Na, Tao, Hongwei, He, Xuezhi, Yu, Wei, Zhang, Renfu, Huang, Ruobing, Ni, Dong, Yang, Xin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives Ultrasound (US) is important for diagnosing infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, the accuracy of the diagnosis depends heavily on expertise. We aimed to develop a novel automatic system (DDHnet) for accurate, fast, and robust diagnosis of DDH. Methods An automatic system, DDHnet, was proposed to diagnose DDH by analyzing static ultrasound images. A five‐fold cross‐validation experiment was conducted using a dataset containing 881 patients to verify the performance of DDHnet. In addition, a blind test was conducted on 209 patients (158 normal and 51 abnormal cases). The feasibility and performance of DDHnet were investigated by embedding it into ultrasound machines at low computational cost. Results DDHnet obtained reliable measurements and accurate diagnosis predictions. It reported an intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC) on α angle of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97), β angle of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95–0.98), FHC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99) and PFD of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.96) in abnormal cases. DDHnet achieved a sensitivity of 90.56%, specificity of 100%, accuracy of 98.64%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.44% for the diagnosis of DDH. For the measurement task on the US device, DDHnet took only 1.1 seconds to operate and complete, whereas the experienced senior expert required an average 41.4 seconds. Conclusions The proposed DDHnet demonstrate state‐of‐the‐art performance for all four indicators of DDH diagnosis. Fast and highly accurate DDH diagnosis is achievable through DDHnet, and is accessible under constrained computational resources.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.16133