Measurement properties of outcome measures used in neurological telerehabilitation: A systematic review using COSMIN checklist

• Published in: Clinical rehabilitation 2023-03, Vol.37 (3), p.415-435
• Main Authors: Brito, Sherindan Ayessa Ferreira de, Scianni, Aline Alvim, Peniche, Paula da Cruz, Faria, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adequacy; Alzheimer Disease; Alzheimer's disease; Checklist - methods; Checklists; Clinical outcomes; Clinical research; Humans; Huntingtons disease; Injuries; Measurement; Multiple sclerosis; Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis; Neurological disorders; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Reliability; Reproducibility of Results; Responsiveness; Spinal cord; Spinal cord injuries; Stroke; Systematic review; Telemedicine; Telerehabilitation; Validity; Video conferencing
• ISSN: 0269-2155; 1477-0873
• DOI: 10.1177/02692155221129834

Objective To summarize the measurement properties (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) and the clinical utility of measurement tools used in telerehabilitation in individuals with neurological conditions. Design Systematic review. Subjects Individuals with neurological conditions. Intervention Not applicable. Main measures The methodological quality of the studies using the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist, the quality of the measurement properties using the criteria for good measurement properties, and the clinical utility of the measurements using the Tyson & Connell scale. Results From the 22,188 identified studies, 47 were included. Forty-three measurement tools were identified. The main modes of administration were telephone and videoconference. Studies involved mostly individuals with stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Criterion validity and reliability were the most investigated measurement properties. None of the tools had their responsiveness investigated. Twenty-two measurement tools have at least one measurement property evaluated as “sufficient” in a study with appropriate methodological quality (“very good” or “adequate”). Nineteen measurement tools showed adequate clinical utility. Eight measurement tools, investigated in individuals with stroke, spinal cord injury or Alzheimer's disease, all administered by telephone, were recommended. Conclusion The present results can be used to assist in choosing appropriate measurement tools, both in research and clinical practice, during telerehabilitation in individuals with neurological conditions. Measurement error, content validity, structural validity, and responsiveness need to be further investigated. In addition, the measurement properties of tools used in telerehabilitation in other neurological conditions, such as Huntington's disease, should also be investigated. Registration number CRD42021257662.