Loading…

The impact of the institutional abdominoperineal resections volume on short-term outcomes and expenses: a nationwide study

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the institutional volume of abdominoperineal resections (APR) on the short-term outcomes and costs in the Brazilian Public Health system. Methods This population-based study evaluated the number of APRs by institutions performed in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Techniques in coloproctology 2023-08, Vol.27 (8), p.647-653
Main Authors: Tustumi, Francisco, Portilho, Ana Sarah, Teivelis, Marcelo Passos, da Silva, Marcelo Fiorelli Alexandrino, Szor, Daniel José, Gerbasi, Lucas Soares, Pandini, Rafael Vaz, Seid, Victor Edmond, Wolosker, Nelson, Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the institutional volume of abdominoperineal resections (APR) on the short-term outcomes and costs in the Brazilian Public Health system. Methods This population-based study evaluated the number of APRs by institutions performed in the Brazilian Public Health system from January/2010 to July/2022. Data were extracted from a public domain from the Brazilian Public Health system. Results Four hundred and twelve hospitals performed APRs and were included. Only 23 performed at least 5 APRs per year on average and were considered high-volume institutions. The linear regression model showed that the number of hospital admissions for APRs was negatively associated with in-hospital mortality (Coef. = − 0.001; p  = 0.013) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (Coef. = − 0.006; p  = 0.01). The number of hospital admissions was not significantly associated with personnel, hospital, and total costs. The in-hospital mortality in high-volume institutions was significantly lower than in low-volume institutions (2.5 vs . 5.9%; p : 
ISSN:1123-6337
1128-045X
DOI:10.1007/s10151-022-02733-7