Loading…

Neural correlates of paired associate recollection: A neuroimaging meta-analysis

[Display omitted] •Studies on paired associate recollection use diverse types of activation contrast.•The Hit > Miss contrast mainly involves regions in the DMN/MTL.•The Intact > Rearranged contrast mainly involves regions in the DMN/MTL.•The Memory > Perception contrast primarily involves...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain research 2023-02, Vol.1801, p.148200-148200, Article 148200
Main Author: Kim, Hongkeun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Studies on paired associate recollection use diverse types of activation contrast.•The Hit > Miss contrast mainly involves regions in the DMN/MTL.•The Intact > Rearranged contrast mainly involves regions in the DMN/MTL.•The Memory > Perception contrast primarily involves regions in the FPCN.•Subcortical effects include the amygdala, striatum, and thalamus regions. Functional neuroimaging data on paired associate recollection have expanded over the years, raising the need for an integrative understanding of the literature. The present study performed a quantitative meta-analysis of the data to fulfill that need. The meta-analysis focused on the three most widely used types of activation contrast: Hit > Miss, Intact > Rearranged, and Memory > Perception. The major results were as follows. First, the Hit > Miss contrast mainly involved regions in the default mode network (DMN)/medial temporal lobe (MTL), likely reflecting a greater amount of retrieved information during the Hit than Miss trials. Second, the Intact > Rearranged contrast mainly involved regions in the DMN/MTL, supporting the view that rejecting recombination foils is based on familiarity with the component parts in the absence of recollection. Third, the Memory > Perception contrast primarily involved regions in the frontoparietal control network, likely reflecting the greater demands on controlled processing during Memory than Perception conditions. Fourth, the subcortical clusters included the amygdala, caudate nucleus/putamen, and mediodorsal thalamus regions, suggesting that these regions are components of the neural circuits supporting associative recollection. Finally, comparisons with previous meta-analyses suggested that associative recollection involves the DMN regions more strongly than source recollection but less strongly than subjective recollection. In conclusion, this study contributes uniquely to the growing literature on paired associate recollection by clarifying the convergent findings and differences among studies.
ISSN:0006-8993
1872-6240
DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148200