Is clinical coordination across care levels different according to the secondary care medical speciality? Results from the Catalan health system

• Published in: The International journal of health planning and management 2023-05, Vol.38 (3), p.643-661
• Main Authors: Campaz‐Landazabal, Daniela, Esteve‐Matalí, Laura, Vargas, Ingrid, Sitjas, Eric, Plaja, Pere, Sánchez, Elvira, Ramon, Isabel, Vázquez, María Luisa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access; care coordination; Child; Coordination; Cross-Sectional Studies; Decentralization; delivery of health care; Geriatricians; Geriatrics; Gynecologists; Gynecology; Health care; health services research, integrated; Hospitals; Humans; Internal Medicine; medical specialities; Multivariate analysis; Pediatrics; Perception; Physicians; Primary care; secondary care; Secondary Care - methods
• ISSN: 0749-6753; 1099-1751
• DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3608

Background Despite the scarce evidence, some studies suggest that cross‐level clinical coordination may vary among secondary care (SC) doctors, influenced by their speciality and organisational model, including degree of decentralisation to primary care (PC). The aim was to determine the differences in experience and perception of cross‐level clinical coordination and related factors according to the SC doctor's speciality in the Catalan health system. Methods Cross‐sectional study, based on an on‐line survey using the COORDENA‐CAT questionnaire, to SC doctors (n = 1666). Descriptive and multivariate analysis were used to compare five groups of SC specialities (decentralised, hospital‐based, internists/geriatricians, gynaecologist, and paediatricians), for experience, perception and factors related to coordination. Results When comparing with decentralised specialities, hospital‐based specialities and internal medicine/geriatrics reported lower care consistency and follow up across levels, while gynaecology and paediatrics, higher accessibility. General perception of cross‐level coordination was lower in hospital‐based specialities (PR:0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.89) and higher in gynaecology (PR:1.36, 95% CI 1.18–1.56). Moreover, hospital‐based specialities reported a lower use of some coordination mechanisms and lower knowledge of the primary care doctors (PR:0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.72), while gynaecology a higher knowledge (PR:2.04, 95% CI 1.22–3.45). Conclusions Results show differences in experience, perception of coordination, organisational and interactional factors across specialities. These differences may be explained by their complexity, coordination needs and organisational model. Further research is needed to clarify and understand the causes of such differences and the particular needs of coordination of each speciality to identify strategies to improve cross‐level clinical coordination. Highlights Perception of clinical coordination is worse in hospital‐based specialities Level of decentralisation to primary care may influence clinical coordination Coordination mechanisms that promote cross‐level interaction should be promoted Needs of each speciality should be explored to improve clinical coordination