Mechano‐cytoskeleton remodeling mechanism and molecular docking studies on nanosurface technology: Titania nanotube arrays

In biomedical implant technology, nanosurface such as titania nanotube arrays (TNA) could provide better cellular adaptation, especially for long‐term tissue acceptance response. Mechanotransduction activities of TNA nanosurface could involve the cytoskeleton remodeling mechanism. However, there is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biotechnology and applied biochemistry 2023-06, Vol.70 (3), p.1072-1084
Main Authors: Mydin, Rabiatul Basria S. M. N., Mahboob, Alam, Sreekantan, Srimala, Saharudin, Khairul Arifah, Qazem, Ekhlas Qaid, Hazan, Roshasnorlyza, Wajidi, Mustafa Fadzil Farid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arrays
Biocompatibility
Cell surface
Cytoskeleton
cytoskeleton remodeling mechanism
cytoskeleton reorganization
Epithelial cells
Epithelium
Extracellular matrix
Mechanotransduction
Molecular docking
Nanotubes
Osmosis
Surgical implants
Technology
titania nanotube arrays
titanium dioxide nanotube arrays
Topography
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In biomedical implant technology, nanosurface such as titania nanotube arrays (TNA) could provide better cellular adaptation, especially for long‐term tissue acceptance response. Mechanotransduction activities of TNA nanosurface could involve the cytoskeleton remodeling mechanism. However, there is no clear insight into TNA mechano‐cytoskeleton remodeling activities, especially computational approaches. Epithelial cells have played critical interface between biomedical implant surface and tissue acceptance, particularly for long‐term interaction. Therefore, this study investigates genomic responses that are responsible for cell–TNA mechano‐stimulus using epithelial cells model. Findings suggested that cell–TNA interaction may improve structural and extracellular matrix (ECM) support on the cells as an adaptive response toward the nanosurface topography. More specifically, the surface topography of the TNA might improve the cell polarity and adhesion properties via the interaction of the plasma membrane and intracellular matrix responses. TNA nanosurface might engross the cytoskeleton remodeling activities for multidirectional cell movement and cellular protrusions on TNA nanosurface. These observations are supported by the molecular docking profiles that determine proteins' in silico binding mechanism on TNA. This active cell‐surface revamping would allow cells to adapt to develop a protective barrier toward TNA nanosurface, thus enhancing biocompatibility properties distinctly for long‐term interaction. The findings from this study will be beneficial toward nano‐molecular knowledge of designing functional nanosurface technology for advanced medical implant applications.
ISSN:0885-4513
1470-8744
DOI:10.1002/bab.2421