Loading…

On the effect of crystallinity on the elastic properties of semicrystalline polyethylene

The small strain elastic response of a semicrystalline polyethylene has been simulated with a simple finite element model comprising a composite microstructure of alternating amorphous and crystalline layers arranged in a multi‐layered spherical shell structure. The crystalline lamella is modeled as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polymer engineering and science 2000-02, Vol.40 (2), p.330-335
Main Author: Doyle, Michael J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The small strain elastic response of a semicrystalline polyethylene has been simulated with a simple finite element model comprising a composite microstructure of alternating amorphous and crystalline layers arranged in a multi‐layered spherical shell structure. The crystalline lamella is modeled as an isotropic solid having the experimentally determined modulus properties of bulk linear polyethylene and extrapolated to 100% crystallinity. The amorphous layer is modeled as an elastomeric solid with the modulus that of molten linear polyethylene extrapolated to room temperature. Assuming constancy of these phase properties, the finite element calculations of elastic modulus versus crystallinity fit quite well the experimental data of Crist for linear polyethylene above 55% crystallinity. At lower crystallinity the experimental modulus data, which are for copolymers, fall below the model calculations. Two possible causes are discussed: the loss of deformation constraint in lamellae of finite and decreasing width as crystallinity declines, and an expansion of the crystal lattice as a result of the crowding of the comonomer units excluded from the crystal lamella. Either effect would reduce both the modulus and the yield stress as is observed.
ISSN:0032-3888
1548-2634
DOI:10.1002/pen.11166