Loading…
Clinical evaluation of cylindrical regional suppression in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: An intra-individual comparison study on image quality and lesion conspicuity
•Cardiac motion artefacts can impair diagnosis in contrast-enhanced breast MRI.•A cylindrical regional-suppression technique can reduce the cardiac signal.•Its use improves the visualization of anatomical structures at the level of axilla.•Lesion conspicuity is not compromised compared to standard b...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of radiology 2023-04, Vol.161, p.110724-110724, Article 110724 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Cardiac motion artefacts can impair diagnosis in contrast-enhanced breast MRI.•A cylindrical regional-suppression technique can reduce the cardiac signal.•Its use improves the visualization of anatomical structures at the level of axilla.•Lesion conspicuity is not compromised compared to standard breast MRI.
To evaluate the effect of a cylindrical regional-suppression technique (CREST) on image quality and lesion conspicuity in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the breast.
This was a comparative study of 67 women with 44 lesions who underwent breast DCE-MRI with CREST (CREST-DCE) and had a previous DCE-MRI without CREST (conv-DCE) available. Two radiologists assessed image quality parameters and lesion conspicuity using five-point Likert scales. In an intra-individual comparison, the effects of CREST on image quality (strong degradation to strong improvement) were assessed. Moreover, both radiologists identified the post-contrast phase, which benefited the most from using CREST in direct comparison. The statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Cardiac motion-rated artefacts were significantly reduced in CREST-DCE compared to conv-DCE (3.6 ± 1.2 [CREST-DCE] vs 2.1 ± 0.8 [conv-DCE], p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110724 |