Loading…
Comparative study of radon sources and associated health risk in four underground uranium mines
This paper presents a comparative study of the quantitative estimation of 222 Rn and its health risk from various sources in four underground uranium mines. 222 Rn exhalation rates from uranium-bearing rocks and backfill materials were estimated by calculating the 222 Rn concentration accumulated in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-03, Vol.195 (3), p.400-400, Article 400 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper presents a comparative study of the quantitative estimation of
222
Rn and its health risk from various sources in four underground uranium mines.
222
Rn exhalation rates from uranium-bearing rocks and backfill materials were estimated by calculating the
222
Rn concentration accumulated in an enclosed chamber into which radon was exhaled. This comparative study indicates a more significant effect of porosity on the exhalation rates. Dissolved
222
Rn in mine water was estimated using scintillation cell and bubbler kit. The discrepancy in
222
Rn concentration in the mines might be attributed to the variation in geological features, ore grade, and porosity. This study revealed that the maximum radon exposure was produced from the backfill mill tailings, followed by uranium ore and mine water in the mines. The radon dose values in the individual mines remained under the safe dose limit of 20 mSv year
−1
. The excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) and
222
Rn-induced lung cancer cases (RnLCC) per million persons per year were also estimated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10661-023-10952-0 |