Loading…

Do treatment methods for deep vein thrombosis have different effects on post-thrombotic syndrome and the quality of life?

Objective This study aimed to compare the effects of interventional methods and medical therapy in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on the risk of development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and the quality of life during the follow-up period. Patients and methods Clinical s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vascular 2024-08, Vol.32 (4), p.874-881
Main Authors: Donbaloğlu, Mehmet Okan, Gürkan, Selami, Gür, Özcan
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This study aimed to compare the effects of interventional methods and medical therapy in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on the risk of development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and the quality of life during the follow-up period. Patients and methods Clinical statuses of the patients who were treated medical therapy alone or medical therapy and endovascular treatment for acute proximal (iliofemoral-popliteal) DVT between 1st January 2014 and 1st November 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. The study included 128 patients who received interventional treatment (Group I) and 120 patients who received medical therapy alone (Group M). The mean age of the patients was 52.98 ± 12.45 years in Group I and 55.60 ± 16.15 years in Group M. Patients were classified as provoked or unprovoked and by LET scale (lower extremity thrombosis level scale). Patients were followed-up for 1 year using Villalta scores and VEINES-QoL/Sym questionnaire. LET scale was evaluated based on the results of lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasound (DUS). Results No early acute phase mortality was observed. LET classification showed that there is higher proximal involvement in Group I (Table 1 Table 1. Demographic data. Group G (n = 128, %) Group M (n = 120, %) p Age(years) mean ± SD 52.98 ± 12.45 55.60 ± 16.15 0.152 Gender(F/M),n 57/71 58/62 0.548 LET classification n (%)  Class 1 0 30 (25)  Class 2 19 (14.9) 66 (55)  Class 3 99 (77.3) 24 (20)  Class 4 10 (7.8) 0  BMI (kg/m2) (mean ± SD) 26.61 ± 4.05 27.86 ± 3.46 0.746  Smoking n (%) 71 (56.25) 89 (74.16) 0.649  DM n (%) 16 (12.5) 20 (16.66) 0.845  HT n (%) 41 (32.03) 29 (24.16) 0.950  Kidney failure n (%) 3 (2.34) 2 (1.66) 0.963 Lateralization n (%)  Right 66 (51.56) 62 (51.66) 0.987  Left 62 (48.44) 58 (48.34) DVT development n (%)  Provoked 52 (40.62) 57 (47.5) 0.546  Unprovoked 76 (59.38) 63 (52.5)  Ulcer 10 13 0.412 ). Recurrence rate was 6.25% (8 patients) in Group I and 21.66% (26 patients) in Group M (p < .001). Pulmonary embolism was not observed in either group. At 12-month follow-up, the number of patients with a Villalta score of ≥5 was 8 (6.25%) in Group I and 81 (67.5%) in Group M (p < .001), while the mean VEINES-QoL/Sym scale score was found to be 72.5 ± 6.35 in Group I and 40.2 ± 9.31 in Group M (p < .001). The rates of anticoagulant-associated bleeding were 3.12% (4 patients) in Group I and 6.66% (8 patients) in Group M. The mean complete recanalization rates calculated using DUS at
ISSN:1708-5381
1708-539X
1708-539X
DOI:10.1177/17085381231158833