Loading…

Automated feedback modestly improves perioperative treatment adherence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Extensive evidence demonstrates that medical record modernization and a vast amount of available data have not overcome the gap between recommended and delivered care. This study aimed to evaluate the use of clinical decision support (CDS) in conjunction with feedback (post-hoc reporting) to improve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2023-06, Vol.86, p.111081-111081, Article 111081
Main Authors: Gruss, Calvin L., Kappen, Teus H., Fowler, Leslie C., Li, Gen, Freundlich, Robert E., McEvoy, Matthew D., Rothman, Brian S., Sandberg, Warren S., Wanderer, Jonathan P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Extensive evidence demonstrates that medical record modernization and a vast amount of available data have not overcome the gap between recommended and delivered care. This study aimed to evaluate the use of clinical decision support (CDS) in conjunction with feedback (post-hoc reporting) to improve PONV medication administration compliance and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) outcomes. Single center, prospective observational study between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2017. Perioperative care at a university-affiliated tertiary care center. 57,401 adult patients who received general anesthesia in a non-emergency setting. A multi-phased intervention that consisted of post-hoc reporting for individual providers by email about PONV occurrences in their patients, followed by directive CDS through preoperative daily case emails that provided therapeutic PONV prophylaxis recommendations based on patients' PONV risk scores. Compliance with PONV medication recommendations, as well as hospital rates of PONV were measured. Over the study period, there was a 5.5% (95% CI, 4.2% to 6.4%; p 
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111081