Acute Mechanical and Metabolic Responses to Different Resistance Training Protocols With Equated Volume Load

• Published in: International journal of sports physiology and performance 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.402-413
• Main Authors: Sánchez-Moreno, Miguel, Rodiles-Guerrero, Luis, Rendeiro-Pinho, Gonçalo, Prieto-Veloso, António, Pareja-Blanco, Fernando
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Exercise; Humans; Lactic Acid; Male; Muscle Fatigue - physiology; Muscle Strength; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Resistance Training - methods
• ISSN: 1555-0265; 1555-0273
• DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0367

To investigate the effect of different resistance training protocols with equated volume load on acute mechanical and metabolic responses. In a randomized order, 18 men performed 8 different training protocols in the bench press exercise consisting of (sets, repetitions, intensity, and interset recoveries) 3 × 16, 40% 1-repetition maximum (1RM), 2 and 5 minutes; 6 × 8, 40% 1RM, 2 and 5 minutes; 3 × 8, 80% 1RM, 2 and 5 minutes; and 6 × 4, 80% 1RM, 2 and 5 minutes. Volume load was equalized between protocols (1920 arbitrary units). Velocity loss and effort index were calculated during the session. Movement velocity against the 60% 1RM and blood lactate concentration pre-post exercise were used to assess the mechanical and metabolic responses, respectively. Resistance training protocols performed with heavy load (80% 1RM) resulted in a lower (P < .05) total number of repetitions (effect size = -2.44) and volume load (effect size = -1.79) than the scheduled ones when longer set configurations and shorter rest periods were used in the same protocol (ie, higher-training-density protocols). Protocols including a higher number of repetitions per set and shorter rest times induced higher velocity loss, effort index, and lactate concentrations than the rest of the protocols. Our results suggest that resistance training protocols with similar volume load but different training variables (ie, intensity, number of sets and repetitions, rest between sets) produce different responses. Implementing a lower number of repetitions per set and longer rest intervals is recommended to reduce the intrasession and postsession fatigue.