Loading…

Assessing reviews of academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons within the US on Healthgrades

Purpose The purpose of the following study was to explore the patient feedback on academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) practicing in the United States (US) using the physician rating website (PRW) Healthgrades.com. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on academic OMSs in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral and maxillofacial surgery 2024-03, Vol.28 (1), p.323-330
Main Authors: Stanbouly, Dani, Rahhal, Zacharie, Talis, Austin, Stanbouly, Rami, Baron, Michael, Arce, Kevin, Chandra, Srinivasa R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of the following study was to explore the patient feedback on academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) practicing in the United States (US) using the physician rating website (PRW) Healthgrades.com. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on academic OMSs in the US using data from Healthgrades.com. Predictor variables included OMS characteristics or rating characteristics. The primary outcome variable was overall rating. Linear regression was used to determine independent predictors of overall rating. Results The final study sample consisted of 309 academic OMSs (mean age, 56.4 years; males, 86.4%). Age group was significantly associated with overall rating ( p = 0.034). Dual-degree OMSs had a higher mean overall rating than single-degree OMSs (4.26 vs. 3.98, p = 0.012). The number of ratings was also significantly associated with overall rating ( p = 0.019). Upon controlling for all other variables, merely age group was independently associated with overall rating. Specifically, OMSs aged 41–55 years were associated with a higher overall rating (+0.96, p = 0.022) relative to OMSs aged >70 years. Conclusions The OPRs on Healthgrades.com for academic OMSs within the US are generally positive. Age was the only independent predictor for overall rating — younger OMSs (aged 41–55 years) were independently associated with a higher overall rating relative to older OMSs (aged >70 years). The new generation of younger OMSs is likely to be aware of PRWs and their implications in the growing world of online exposure.
ISSN:1865-1569
1865-1550
1865-1569
DOI:10.1007/s10006-023-01146-6