Excess methane production and operation stability for anaerobic digestion of oily food waste controlled by mixing intensity: Focusing on heterogeneity of long chain fatty acids

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2023-06, Vol.335, p.117573-117573, Article 117573
• Main Authors: Wu, Li-Jie, Hao, Zi-Wen, Li, Xiao-Xiao, Ye, Fei, Yang, Fan, Lyu, Yong-Kang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anaerobic digestion; Anaerobiosis; Continuous stirred tank reactor; Fatty Acids; Food; Long chain fatty acid; Methane; Methanogenesis; Mixing intensity; Oils; Oily food waste; Refuse Disposal - methods
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117573

Long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) are the key intermediate of anaerobic digestion of oily food waste, not completely soluble in a water-dominant anaerobic system due to their long hydrocarbon chains with hydrophobic property. Their effective concentration affects release of high methanogenic potential and system stability. A long-term continuous anaerobic digestion of oily food waste demonstrated excess methane production of even more than feedstock in an anaerobic continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). Assuming feedstock COD at 100%, approximately 120% of COD as methane could be achieved. Oil floating and crystallization with Ca salt resulting from the distribution heterogeneity of LCFAs in the CSTR were found responsible for the excess methane production. Moreover, slow conversion and accumulation of saturated LCFAs with relatively lower solubility played an important role as well. Compared with unsaturated oleic (C18:1) and linoleic acids (C18:2), around twice slower methane production rate and longer lag time could be observed for those saturated LCFAs. Mixing intensity was proved to be a critical controlling factor for methanogenesis and stability possibly by affecting interaction between oil/LCFAs and anaerobes to change effective lipid loading. •Excess methane could be produced in an anaerobic CSTR with oily food waste fed.•Heterogeneity, crystallization and slow degradation rate were responsible.•Mixing intensity was significant for excess methanogenesis and system stability.