Loading…

Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding

Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleedin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastroenterology 2023-05, Vol.58 (5), p.494-502
Main Authors: Ma, Li, Liu, Yaozu, Yan, Zhiping, Zhang, Wen, Zhang, Zihan, Yang, Minjie, Yu, Jiaze, Zhou, Xin, Chen, Shiyao, Wang, Jian, Ma, Jingqin, Luo, Jianjun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding. Methods The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months. Results After TIPS, PAG was equal to ( n  = 115) or more than ( n  = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg ( p  
ISSN:0944-1174
1435-5922
DOI:10.1007/s00535-023-01977-w