Loading…

Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding

Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleedin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastroenterology 2023-05, Vol.58 (5), p.494-502
Main Authors: Ma, Li, Liu, Yaozu, Yan, Zhiping, Zhang, Wen, Zhang, Zihan, Yang, Minjie, Yu, Jiaze, Zhou, Xin, Chen, Shiyao, Wang, Jian, Ma, Jingqin, Luo, Jianjun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623
container_end_page 502
container_issue 5
container_start_page 494
container_title Journal of gastroenterology
container_volume 58
creator Ma, Li
Liu, Yaozu
Yan, Zhiping
Zhang, Wen
Zhang, Zihan
Yang, Minjie
Yu, Jiaze
Zhou, Xin
Chen, Shiyao
Wang, Jian
Ma, Jingqin
Luo, Jianjun
description Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding. Methods The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months. Results After TIPS, PAG was equal to ( n  = 115) or more than ( n  = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00535-023-01977-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2785199141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747336505</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747336505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us2OFCEYJEbjjqMv4MGQePHSKzQ0NMfNxL9kEy96JjT9dQ-THmiBns28iw8rY69uNMZwIPVRVSmgEHpJyTUlRL5NhDSsqUjNKkKVlNXdI7ShvIwaVdeP0YYozitKJb9Cz1I6EEIZadqn6IqJVtWCtRv0fReOs4nOjzjvAc8RemezOwE2nZtcPuMw4DnEHEyOzkzY-H7F1pwKHKPpHfiMzZAh4hyNT4dlXCYTsfMF7mE22dlVk84pw7GgtF-KxkYoZ8HjIUR8KiksFMsI3QQlhh-foyeDmRK8uN-36Ov7d192H6vbzx8-7W5uK8uFyFVbC0F7roSiUskBOmC9VYIoo3jf8I6zXhEgigphhK2Vta1VRUS4kr0QNduiN6vvHMO3BVLWR5csTJPxEJaka9k2VCnKaaG-_ot6CEv0JZ2uW0WYkFLIB9ZoJtDOD6G8hL2Y6hvJJWOiKV-3Rdf_YJXVX94oeBhcmf8hqFeBjSGlCIOeozuaeNaU6Esl9FoJXSqhf1ZC3xXRq_vES3eE_rfkVwcKga2ENF96APHhSv-x_QGDvsQV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890367767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ma, Li ; Liu, Yaozu ; Yan, Zhiping ; Zhang, Wen ; Zhang, Zihan ; Yang, Minjie ; Yu, Jiaze ; Zhou, Xin ; Chen, Shiyao ; Wang, Jian ; Ma, Jingqin ; Luo, Jianjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Li ; Liu, Yaozu ; Yan, Zhiping ; Zhang, Wen ; Zhang, Zihan ; Yang, Minjie ; Yu, Jiaze ; Zhou, Xin ; Chen, Shiyao ; Wang, Jian ; Ma, Jingqin ; Luo, Jianjun</creatorcontrib><description>Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding. Methods The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months. Results After TIPS, PAG was equal to ( n  = 115) or more than ( n  = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg ( p  &lt; 0.001, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10–1.37). Using a threshold of 12 mmHg, PAG ( p  = 0.081, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37–1.06) could not predict variceal rebleeding but PCG could ( p  = 0.003, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26–0.77). This pattern was unchanged when a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline was also considered as a threshold (PAG/PCG: p  = 0.114 and 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that only in patients with post-TIPS IVC pressure &lt; 9 mmHg ( p  = 0.018), PAG could predict variceal rebleeding. Because PAG was on average 1.4 mmHg higher than PCG, patients were classified by a PAG of 14 mmHg, and there was no difference in rebleeding rates between these two groups ( p  = 0.574). Conclusions For patients with variceal bleeding, the predictive ability of PAG is limited. The portal pressure gradient should be measured between the PV and IVC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00535-023-01977-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36892638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal Surgery ; Biliary Tract ; Bleeding ; Catheters ; Colorectal Surgery ; Comparative analysis ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - etiology ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver Cirrhosis - complications ; Liver diseases ; Local anesthesia ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article―Liver ; Pancreas ; Patients ; Portal vein ; Portal Vein - surgery ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Stents ; Surgical Oncology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology, 2023-05, Vol.58 (5), p.494-502</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Gastroenterology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4942-0439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36892638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yaozu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Minjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jiaze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jingqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jianjun</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding. Methods The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months. Results After TIPS, PAG was equal to ( n  = 115) or more than ( n  = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg ( p  &lt; 0.001, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10–1.37). Using a threshold of 12 mmHg, PAG ( p  = 0.081, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37–1.06) could not predict variceal rebleeding but PCG could ( p  = 0.003, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26–0.77). This pattern was unchanged when a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline was also considered as a threshold (PAG/PCG: p  = 0.114 and 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that only in patients with post-TIPS IVC pressure &lt; 9 mmHg ( p  = 0.018), PAG could predict variceal rebleeding. Because PAG was on average 1.4 mmHg higher than PCG, patients were classified by a PAG of 14 mmHg, and there was no difference in rebleeding rates between these two groups ( p  = 0.574). Conclusions For patients with variceal bleeding, the predictive ability of PAG is limited. The portal pressure gradient should be measured between the PV and IVC.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Biliary Tract</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - etiology</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Local anesthesia</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article―Liver</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Portal vein</subject><subject>Portal Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0944-1174</issn><issn>1435-5922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Us2OFCEYJEbjjqMv4MGQePHSKzQ0NMfNxL9kEy96JjT9dQ-THmiBns28iw8rY69uNMZwIPVRVSmgEHpJyTUlRL5NhDSsqUjNKkKVlNXdI7ShvIwaVdeP0YYozitKJb9Cz1I6EEIZadqn6IqJVtWCtRv0fReOs4nOjzjvAc8RemezOwE2nZtcPuMw4DnEHEyOzkzY-H7F1pwKHKPpHfiMzZAh4hyNT4dlXCYTsfMF7mE22dlVk84pw7GgtF-KxkYoZ8HjIUR8KiksFMsI3QQlhh-foyeDmRK8uN-36Ov7d192H6vbzx8-7W5uK8uFyFVbC0F7roSiUskBOmC9VYIoo3jf8I6zXhEgigphhK2Vta1VRUS4kr0QNduiN6vvHMO3BVLWR5csTJPxEJaka9k2VCnKaaG-_ot6CEv0JZ2uW0WYkFLIB9ZoJtDOD6G8hL2Y6hvJJWOiKV-3Rdf_YJXVX94oeBhcmf8hqFeBjSGlCIOeozuaeNaU6Esl9FoJXSqhf1ZC3xXRq_vES3eE_rfkVwcKga2ENF96APHhSv-x_QGDvsQV</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Ma, Li</creator><creator>Liu, Yaozu</creator><creator>Yan, Zhiping</creator><creator>Zhang, Wen</creator><creator>Zhang, Zihan</creator><creator>Yang, Minjie</creator><creator>Yu, Jiaze</creator><creator>Zhou, Xin</creator><creator>Chen, Shiyao</creator><creator>Wang, Jian</creator><creator>Ma, Jingqin</creator><creator>Luo, Jianjun</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-0439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding</title><author>Ma, Li ; Liu, Yaozu ; Yan, Zhiping ; Zhang, Wen ; Zhang, Zihan ; Yang, Minjie ; Yu, Jiaze ; Zhou, Xin ; Chen, Shiyao ; Wang, Jian ; Ma, Jingqin ; Luo, Jianjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Biliary Tract</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - etiology</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Local anesthesia</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article―Liver</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Portal vein</topic><topic>Portal Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yaozu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Minjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jiaze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jingqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jianjun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Li</au><au>Liu, Yaozu</au><au>Yan, Zhiping</au><au>Zhang, Wen</au><au>Zhang, Zihan</au><au>Yang, Minjie</au><au>Yu, Jiaze</au><au>Zhou, Xin</au><au>Chen, Shiyao</au><au>Wang, Jian</au><au>Ma, Jingqin</au><au>Luo, Jianjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology</jtitle><stitle>J Gastroenterol</stitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>494-502</pages><issn>0944-1174</issn><eissn>1435-5922</eissn><abstract>Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding. Methods The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months. Results After TIPS, PAG was equal to ( n  = 115) or more than ( n  = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg ( p  &lt; 0.001, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10–1.37). Using a threshold of 12 mmHg, PAG ( p  = 0.081, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37–1.06) could not predict variceal rebleeding but PCG could ( p  = 0.003, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26–0.77). This pattern was unchanged when a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline was also considered as a threshold (PAG/PCG: p  = 0.114 and 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that only in patients with post-TIPS IVC pressure &lt; 9 mmHg ( p  = 0.018), PAG could predict variceal rebleeding. Because PAG was on average 1.4 mmHg higher than PCG, patients were classified by a PAG of 14 mmHg, and there was no difference in rebleeding rates between these two groups ( p  = 0.574). Conclusions For patients with variceal bleeding, the predictive ability of PAG is limited. The portal pressure gradient should be measured between the PV and IVC.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><pmid>36892638</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00535-023-01977-w</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-0439</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1174
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology, 2023-05, Vol.58 (5), p.494-502
issn 0944-1174
1435-5922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2785199141
source Springer Link
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal Surgery
Biliary Tract
Bleeding
Catheters
Colorectal Surgery
Comparative analysis
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - etiology
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - surgery
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery
Hepatology
Hospitals
Humans
Liver cirrhosis
Liver Cirrhosis - complications
Liver diseases
Local anesthesia
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article―Liver
Pancreas
Patients
Portal vein
Portal Vein - surgery
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Stents
Surgical Oncology
Treatment Outcome
title Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A57%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20predictive%20ability%20of%20portoatrial%20and%20portocaval%20gradient%20after%20transjugular%20intrahepatic%20portosystemic%20shunt%20creation%20for%20variceal%20rebleeding&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Ma,%20Li&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=494-502&rft.issn=0944-1174&rft.eissn=1435-5922&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00535-023-01977-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747336505%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82661d49691797febe3dc9609a94d54b43d90e09166a6c29cc8c98260497d6623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890367767&rft_id=info:pmid/36892638&rft_galeid=A747336505&rfr_iscdi=true