Loading…

Transcatheter versus surgical treatment for isolated superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect

Background The superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect is a congenital communication between the left and right atria. Open surgical approach by patch closure has historically been the only treatment option. Recently, a transcatheter approach has been developed. This study aims to compare the ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2023-05, Vol.101 (6), p.1098-1107
Main Authors: Brancato, Federica, Stephenson, Natasha, Rosenthal, Eric, Hansen, Jan H., Jones, Matthew I., Qureshi, Shakeel, Austin, Conal, Speggiorin, Simone, Caner, Salih, Butera, Gianfranco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect is a congenital communication between the left and right atria. Open surgical approach by patch closure has historically been the only treatment option. Recently, a transcatheter approach has been developed. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical and transcatheter approach in treatment of sinus venosus atrial septal defect. Methods Between March 2010 and December 2020, 58 patients (median age: 45.4, range 14.8−73.8) underwent either surgical or transcatheter correction of superior sinus venosus atrial septal defect with partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Results Twenty‐four patients (median age: 35.4, range 14.8−66.8) underwent surgery while 34 patients (median age: 46.8, range 15.5−73.8) had a transcatheter treatment. During the catheterization era, 41 patients was considered suitable for a transcatheter closure. In 5 patients, surgery was the patient's or referring physician's choice. In 2 cases, the procedure was unsuccessful; the remaining 34 were successfully closed (94.4% of cases). Intensive care unit stay (median of 1 day, range 0.5−4, vs. 0, range 0−2, p 
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.30650