Loading…

Reactivity of a Dithiocarbamate-Ligated [WVIS] Complex with Hydride Donors: Toward a Synthetic Mimic of Formate Dehydrogenase

Formate dehydrogenase (FDH) enzymes catalyze redox interconversion of CO2 and HCO2 –, with a key mechanistic step being the transfer of H– from HCO2 – to an oxidized active site featuring a [MVIS] group in a sulfur-rich environment (M = Mo or W). Here, we report reactivity studies with HCO2 – and o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Inorganic chemistry 2023-04, Vol.62 (16), p.6332-6338
Main Authors: Basu, Debashis, Subasinghe, S. M. Supundrika, Mankad, Neal P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Formate dehydrogenase (FDH) enzymes catalyze redox interconversion of CO2 and HCO2 –, with a key mechanistic step being the transfer of H– from HCO2 – to an oxidized active site featuring a [MVIS] group in a sulfur-rich environment (M = Mo or W). Here, we report reactivity studies with HCO2 – and other reducing agents of a synthetic [WVIS] model complex ligated by dithiocarbamate (dtc) ligands. Reactions of [WVIS­(dtc)3]­[BF4] (1) conducted in MeOH solvent generated [WVIS­(S2)­(dtc)2] (2) and [WVS­(μ-S)­(dtc)]2 (3) products by a solvolysis pathway that was accelerated by the presence of [Me4N]­[HCO2] but did not require it. Under MeOH-free conditions, the reaction of 1 with [Et4N]­[HCO2] produced some [WIV(μ-S)­(μ-dtc)­(dtc)]2 (4), but predominantly [WV(dtc)4]+ (5), along with stoichiometric CO2 detected by headspace gas chromatography (GC) analysis. Stronger hydride sources such as K-selectride generated the more reduced analogue, 4, exclusively. The reaction of 1 with the electron donor, CoCp2, also produced 4 and 5 in varying amounts depending on reaction conditions. These results indicate that formates and borohydrides act as electron donors rather than hydride donors toward 1, an outcome that diverges from the behavior of FDHs. The difference is ascribed to the more oxidizing potential of [WVIS] complex 1 when supported by monoanionic dtc ligands that allows electron transfer to outcompete hydride transfer, as compared to the more reduced [MVIS] active sites supported by dianionic pyranopterindithiolate ligands in FDHs.
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00086