Loading…
Cerebral revascularization surgery reduces cerebrovascular events in children with sickle cell disease and moyamoya syndrome: Results of the stroke in sickle cell revascularization surgery retrospective study
Background Recent studies suggest that cerebral revascularization surgery may be a safe and effective therapy to reduce stroke risk in patients with sickle cell disease and moyamoya syndrome (SCD–MMS). Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of children with SCD–MMS treated with cons...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric blood & cancer 2023-07, Vol.70 (7), p.e30336-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Recent studies suggest that cerebral revascularization surgery may be a safe and effective therapy to reduce stroke risk in patients with sickle cell disease and moyamoya syndrome (SCD–MMS).
Methods
We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of children with SCD–MMS treated with conservative management alone (conservative group)—chronic blood transfusion and/or hydroxyurea—versus conservative management plus surgical revascularization (surgery group). We monitored cerebrovascular event (CVE) rates—a composite of strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare CVE occurrence and multivariable Poisson regression was used to compare incidence rates between groups. Covariates in multivariable models included age at treatment start, age at moyamoya diagnosis, antiplatelet use, CVE history, and the risk period length.
Results
We identified 141 patients with SCD–MMS, 78 (55.3%) in the surgery group and 63 (44.7%) in the conservative group. Compared with the conservative group, preoperatively the surgery group had a younger age at moyamoya diagnosis, worse baseline modified Rankin scale scores, and increased prevalence of CVEs. Despite more severe pretreatment disease, the surgery group had reduced odds of new CVEs after surgery (odds ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08–0.94, p = .040). Furthermore, comparing surgery group patients during presurgical versus postsurgical periods, CVEs odds were significantly reduced after surgery (odds ratio = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.08–0.58, p = .002).
Conclusions
When added to conservative management, cerebral revascularization surgery appears to reduce the risk of CVEs in patients with SCD–MMS. A prospective study will be needed to validate these findings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1545-5009 1545-5017 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pbc.30336 |