Loading…
A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust
In this research, enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index were utilized to explore the contamination characteristics of toxic elements (TEs) in park dust. The results exhibited that park dust in the study area was mainly moderately polluted, and the EF values of dust Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Sb we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental geochemistry and health 2023-08, Vol.45 (8), p.5813-5827 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13 |
container_end_page | 5827 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 5813 |
container_title | Environmental geochemistry and health |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Huang, Chang-Chen Cai, Li-Mei Xu, Yao-Hui Jie, Luo Hu, Guo-Cheng Chen, Lai-Guo Wang, Han-Zhi Xu, Xu-Bang Mei, Jing-Xian |
description | In this research, enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index were utilized to explore the contamination characteristics of toxic elements (TEs) in park dust. The results exhibited that park dust in the study area was mainly moderately polluted, and the EF values of dust Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Sb were all > 1. The concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn and Pb increased with the decrease of dust particle size. The investigation results of chemical speciation and bioavailability of TEs showed that Zn had the highest bioavailability. Three sources of TEs were determined by positive matrix factorization model, Pearson correlation analysis and geostatistical analysis, comprising factor 1 mixed sources of industrial and transportation activities (46.62%), factor 2 natural source (25.56%) and factor 3 mixed source of agricultural activities and the aging of park infrastructures (27.82%). Potential ecological risk (PER) and human health risk (HHR) models based on source apportionment were exploited to estimate PER and HHR of TEs from different sources. The mean PER value of TEs in the park dust was 114, indicating that ecological risk in the study area was relatively high. Factor 1 contributed the most to PER, and the pollution of Cd was the most serious. There were no significant carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for children and adults in the study area. And factor 3 was the biggest source of non-carcinogenic risk, and As, Cr and Pb were the chief contributor to non-carcinogenic risk. The primary source of carcinogenic risk was factor 2, and Cr was the cardinal cancer risk element. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10653-023-01588-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810920715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2845969094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhS0EopfCH2CBLLFhE_DzOl5WFS-pEhtYW3OdCXGbOKknQXTDb8eXW0BiwcIa6fibYx8dxp5L8VoK4d6QFHurG6HqkbZtG_eA7aR1ulG-1Q_ZTqi9b4ww6ow9IboWQnhn2sfsTDtpWqPaHftxweM8LQUHzJS-IYdlKTPEga8zv90gr6m_4-uAnOatROSpw6OWIqxpzhxyx4dtgswHhHEdeEl0w4EIiaZK8rmvTt9T5DjiUSCeMl-g3PBuo_Upe9TDSPjsfp6zL-_efr780Fx9ev_x8uKqiUb6tTlY37UH0HXq6PcR276zfadrGifBSui1dx14WwW0vRVGGw_RKIVSAUh9zl6dfGu42w1pDVOiiOMIGeeNgmql8Eo4aSv68h_0uibP9XeVMtbvvfCmUupExTITFezDUtIE5S5IEY7thFM7obYTfrUTXF16cW-9HSbs_qz8rqMC-gRQvcpfsfx9-z-2PwGLnZwp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2845969094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Huang, Chang-Chen ; Cai, Li-Mei ; Xu, Yao-Hui ; Jie, Luo ; Hu, Guo-Cheng ; Chen, Lai-Guo ; Wang, Han-Zhi ; Xu, Xu-Bang ; Mei, Jing-Xian</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chang-Chen ; Cai, Li-Mei ; Xu, Yao-Hui ; Jie, Luo ; Hu, Guo-Cheng ; Chen, Lai-Guo ; Wang, Han-Zhi ; Xu, Xu-Bang ; Mei, Jing-Xian</creatorcontrib><description>In this research, enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index were utilized to explore the contamination characteristics of toxic elements (TEs) in park dust. The results exhibited that park dust in the study area was mainly moderately polluted, and the EF values of dust Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Sb were all > 1. The concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn and Pb increased with the decrease of dust particle size. The investigation results of chemical speciation and bioavailability of TEs showed that Zn had the highest bioavailability. Three sources of TEs were determined by positive matrix factorization model, Pearson correlation analysis and geostatistical analysis, comprising factor 1 mixed sources of industrial and transportation activities (46.62%), factor 2 natural source (25.56%) and factor 3 mixed source of agricultural activities and the aging of park infrastructures (27.82%). Potential ecological risk (PER) and human health risk (HHR) models based on source apportionment were exploited to estimate PER and HHR of TEs from different sources. The mean PER value of TEs in the park dust was 114, indicating that ecological risk in the study area was relatively high. Factor 1 contributed the most to PER, and the pollution of Cd was the most serious. There were no significant carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for children and adults in the study area. And factor 3 was the biggest source of non-carcinogenic risk, and As, Cr and Pb were the chief contributor to non-carcinogenic risk. The primary source of carcinogenic risk was factor 2, and Cr was the cardinal cancer risk element.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-4042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10653-023-01588-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37148428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aging (natural) ; Atmospheric particulates ; Bioavailability ; Cadmium ; Carcinogens ; Chemical speciation ; Chromium ; Contamination ; Copper ; Correlation analysis ; Dust ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Geochemistry ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Lead ; Original Paper ; Pollutant load ; Pollution ; Pollution index ; Pollution load ; Public Health ; Risk assessment ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Speciation ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Environmental geochemistry and health, 2023-08, Vol.45 (8), p.5813-5827</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chang-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Li-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yao-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jie, Luo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guo-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Lai-Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Han-Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xu-Bang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Jing-Xian</creatorcontrib><title>A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust</title><title>Environmental geochemistry and health</title><addtitle>Environ Geochem Health</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Geochem Health</addtitle><description>In this research, enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index were utilized to explore the contamination characteristics of toxic elements (TEs) in park dust. The results exhibited that park dust in the study area was mainly moderately polluted, and the EF values of dust Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Sb were all > 1. The concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn and Pb increased with the decrease of dust particle size. The investigation results of chemical speciation and bioavailability of TEs showed that Zn had the highest bioavailability. Three sources of TEs were determined by positive matrix factorization model, Pearson correlation analysis and geostatistical analysis, comprising factor 1 mixed sources of industrial and transportation activities (46.62%), factor 2 natural source (25.56%) and factor 3 mixed source of agricultural activities and the aging of park infrastructures (27.82%). Potential ecological risk (PER) and human health risk (HHR) models based on source apportionment were exploited to estimate PER and HHR of TEs from different sources. The mean PER value of TEs in the park dust was 114, indicating that ecological risk in the study area was relatively high. Factor 1 contributed the most to PER, and the pollution of Cd was the most serious. There were no significant carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for children and adults in the study area. And factor 3 was the biggest source of non-carcinogenic risk, and As, Cr and Pb were the chief contributor to non-carcinogenic risk. The primary source of carcinogenic risk was factor 2, and Cr was the cardinal cancer risk element.</description><subject>Aging (natural)</subject><subject>Atmospheric particulates</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Chemical speciation</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pollutant load</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution index</subject><subject>Pollution load</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0269-4042</issn><issn>1573-2983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhS0EopfCH2CBLLFhE_DzOl5WFS-pEhtYW3OdCXGbOKknQXTDb8eXW0BiwcIa6fibYx8dxp5L8VoK4d6QFHurG6HqkbZtG_eA7aR1ulG-1Q_ZTqi9b4ww6ow9IboWQnhn2sfsTDtpWqPaHftxweM8LQUHzJS-IYdlKTPEga8zv90gr6m_4-uAnOatROSpw6OWIqxpzhxyx4dtgswHhHEdeEl0w4EIiaZK8rmvTt9T5DjiUSCeMl-g3PBuo_Upe9TDSPjsfp6zL-_efr780Fx9ev_x8uKqiUb6tTlY37UH0HXq6PcR276zfadrGifBSui1dx14WwW0vRVGGw_RKIVSAUh9zl6dfGu42w1pDVOiiOMIGeeNgmql8Eo4aSv68h_0uibP9XeVMtbvvfCmUupExTITFezDUtIE5S5IEY7thFM7obYTfrUTXF16cW-9HSbs_qz8rqMC-gRQvcpfsfx9-z-2PwGLnZwp</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Huang, Chang-Chen</creator><creator>Cai, Li-Mei</creator><creator>Xu, Yao-Hui</creator><creator>Jie, Luo</creator><creator>Hu, Guo-Cheng</creator><creator>Chen, Lai-Guo</creator><creator>Wang, Han-Zhi</creator><creator>Xu, Xu-Bang</creator><creator>Mei, Jing-Xian</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust</title><author>Huang, Chang-Chen ; Cai, Li-Mei ; Xu, Yao-Hui ; Jie, Luo ; Hu, Guo-Cheng ; Chen, Lai-Guo ; Wang, Han-Zhi ; Xu, Xu-Bang ; Mei, Jing-Xian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aging (natural)</topic><topic>Atmospheric particulates</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Chemical speciation</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pollutant load</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution index</topic><topic>Pollution load</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chang-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Li-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yao-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jie, Luo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guo-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Lai-Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Han-Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xu-Bang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Jing-Xian</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental geochemistry and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Chang-Chen</au><au>Cai, Li-Mei</au><au>Xu, Yao-Hui</au><au>Jie, Luo</au><au>Hu, Guo-Cheng</au><au>Chen, Lai-Guo</au><au>Wang, Han-Zhi</au><au>Xu, Xu-Bang</au><au>Mei, Jing-Xian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust</atitle><jtitle>Environmental geochemistry and health</jtitle><stitle>Environ Geochem Health</stitle><addtitle>Environ Geochem Health</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>5813</spage><epage>5827</epage><pages>5813-5827</pages><issn>0269-4042</issn><eissn>1573-2983</eissn><abstract>In this research, enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index were utilized to explore the contamination characteristics of toxic elements (TEs) in park dust. The results exhibited that park dust in the study area was mainly moderately polluted, and the EF values of dust Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Sb were all > 1. The concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn and Pb increased with the decrease of dust particle size. The investigation results of chemical speciation and bioavailability of TEs showed that Zn had the highest bioavailability. Three sources of TEs were determined by positive matrix factorization model, Pearson correlation analysis and geostatistical analysis, comprising factor 1 mixed sources of industrial and transportation activities (46.62%), factor 2 natural source (25.56%) and factor 3 mixed source of agricultural activities and the aging of park infrastructures (27.82%). Potential ecological risk (PER) and human health risk (HHR) models based on source apportionment were exploited to estimate PER and HHR of TEs from different sources. The mean PER value of TEs in the park dust was 114, indicating that ecological risk in the study area was relatively high. Factor 1 contributed the most to PER, and the pollution of Cd was the most serious. There were no significant carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for children and adults in the study area. And factor 3 was the biggest source of non-carcinogenic risk, and As, Cr and Pb were the chief contributor to non-carcinogenic risk. The primary source of carcinogenic risk was factor 2, and Cr was the cardinal cancer risk element.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>37148428</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10653-023-01588-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-4042 |
ispartof | Environmental geochemistry and health, 2023-08, Vol.45 (8), p.5813-5827 |
issn | 0269-4042 1573-2983 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810920715 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aging (natural) Atmospheric particulates Bioavailability Cadmium Carcinogens Chemical speciation Chromium Contamination Copper Correlation analysis Dust Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Geochemistry Health risk assessment Health risks Lead Original Paper Pollutant load Pollution Pollution index Pollution load Public Health Risk assessment Soil Science & Conservation Speciation Terrestrial Pollution Zinc |
title | A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A09%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comprehensive%20approach%20to%20quantify%20the%20source%20identification%20and%20human%20health%20risk%20assessment%20of%20toxic%20elements%20in%20park%20dust&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20geochemistry%20and%20health&rft.au=Huang,%20Chang-Chen&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5813&rft.epage=5827&rft.pages=5813-5827&rft.issn=0269-4042&rft.eissn=1573-2983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10653-023-01588-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2845969094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b59d8ba3b593c96ce8fd5fd374871a51af397da95748e5f504349ac422e12aa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2845969094&rft_id=info:pmid/37148428&rfr_iscdi=true |