Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis

The evaluation of the failure probability and safety levels of structural systems is of extreme importance in structural design, mainly when the variables are eminently random. Some examples of random variables on real structures are material properties, loads and member dimensions. It is necessary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Structural safety 2004, Vol.26 (1), p.49-67
Main Authors: Gomes, Herbert Martins, Awruch, Armando Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Artificial neural network
Buildings. Public works
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Exact sciences and technology
Response surface
Stresses. Safety
Structural analysis. Stresses
Structural reliability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The evaluation of the failure probability and safety levels of structural systems is of extreme importance in structural design, mainly when the variables are eminently random. Some examples of random variables on real structures are material properties, loads and member dimensions. It is necessary to quantify and compare the importance of each one of these variables in the structural safety. Many researchers studied structural reliability problems and nowadays there are several approaches for these problems. Two recent approaches, the Response Surface (RS) and the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques, have emerged attempting to solve complex and more elaborated problems. In this work, these two techniques are presented, and comparison are carried out using the well known First Order Reliability Method (FORM), Direct Monte Carlo Simulation and Monte Carlo Simulation with Adaptive Importance Sampling technique with approximated and exact limit state functions. Problems with simple limit state functions (LSF) and closed form solutions of the failure probability are solved in order to highlight the advantages and shortcomings using these techniques. Some remarks are outlined regarding the fact that RS and ANN techniques have presented equivalent precision levels. It is observed that in problems where the computational cost of structural evaluations (looking for the failure probability and safety levels) is high, these two techniques may turn feasible the evaluation of the structural reliability through simulation techniques.
ISSN:0167-4730
1879-3355
DOI:10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00022-5