The relative contributions of multiarticular snake muscles to movement in different planes

• Published in: Journal of morphology (1931) 2023-06, Vol.284 (6), p.e21591-n/a
• Main Authors: Tingle, Jessica L., Jurestovsky, Derek J., Astley, Henry C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: allometry; Animals; biomechanics; Colubridae; functional morphology; Locomotion - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology; range of motion; Spine - anatomy & histology; squamates; vertebrates
• ISSN: 0362-2525; 1097-4687
• DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21591

Muscles spanning multiple joints play important functional roles in a wide range of systems across tetrapods; however, their fundamental mechanics are poorly understood, particularly the consequences of anatomical position on mechanical advantage. Snakes provide an excellent study system for advancing this topic. They rely on the axial muscles for many activities, including striking, constriction, defensive displays, and locomotion. Moreover, those muscles span from one or a few vertebrae to over 30, and anatomy varies among muscles and among species. We characterized the anatomy of major epaxial muscles in a size series of corn snakes (Pantherophis guttatus) using diceCT scans, and then took several approaches to calculating contributions of each muscle to force and motion generated during body bending, starting from a highly simplistic model and moving to increasingly complex and realistic models. Only the most realistic model yielded equations that included the consequence of muscle span on torque‐displacement trade‐offs, as well as resolving ambiguities that arose from simpler models. We also tested whether muscle cross‐sectional areas or lever arms (total magnitude or pitch/yaw/roll components) were related to snake mass, longitudinal body region (anterior, middle, posterior), and/or muscle group (semispinalis‐spinalis, multifidus, longissimus dorsi, iliocostalis, and levator costae). Muscle cross‐sectional areas generally scaled with positive allometry, and most lever arms did not depart significantly from geometric similarity (isometry). The levator costae had lower cross‐sectional area than the four epaxial muscles, which did not differ significantly from each other in cross‐sectional area. Lever arm total magnitudes and components differed among muscles. We found some evidence for regional variation, indicating that functional regionalization merits further investigation. Our results contribute to knowledge of snake muscles specifically and multiarticular muscle systems generally, providing a foundation for future comparisons across species and bioinspired multiarticular systems. This study examines the mechanics of snake muscles spanning multiple joints. In so doing, it first takes a lever‐arm approach to muscle function, and then it provides a new explicitly multiarticular equation (applicable to other multiarticular systems) that relates muscle length changes to postural changes. The results of this study contribute to knowledge of snake muscle