Short term clinical and patient reported outcomes following Virtual Fracture Clinic management of fifth metatarsal fractures

• Published in: Injury 2023-08, Vol.54 (8), p.110853-110853, Article 110853
• Main Authors: Galloway, Richard, Zahan, Nusrat, Patil, Amogh, Stimler, Batya, Patel, Amit, Parker, Lee, Romans, Francesc Malagelada, Jeyaseelan, Luckshmana
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinic; Fracture; Metatarsal; Outcomes; Virtual
• ISSN: 0020-1383; 1879-0267
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110853

•Fracture clinics are experiencing increased referrals and decreased capacity.•There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of a VFC model in the management of 5th metatarsal fractures; optimal treatment remains controversial.•We have shown that the VFC model, with a well-defined protocol, is safe, time efficient, cost effective and acceptable to patients using the service.•It has increased our patients access to timely specialist opinion, whilst reducing strain on our fracture clinic services.•Conservative management can prove effective for a variety of fifth metatarsal base fracture patterns, with excellent short-term quality of life indicators. Fracture clinics are experiencing increased referrals and decreased capacity. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) are an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for specified injury presentations. There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of a VFC model in the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in VFC. We hypothesise that it is both safe and cost effectiveness. Patients presenting to VFC at our major trauma centre with a 5th metatarsal base fracture, between January 2019 and December 2019, were included. Patient demographics, clinic appointments, complication and operative rates were analysed. Patients received standardised VFC treatment; walker boot/full weight bearing, rehabilitation information and instructions to contact VFC if symptoms of pain persist after 4 months. Minimum follow-up was one year; Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaires (MOXFQ) were distributed. A basic cost analysis was performed. 126 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 41.6 years (18–92). Average time from ED attendance to VFC review was 2 days (1 – 5). Fractures were classified according to the Lawrence and Botte Classification with 104 (82%) zone 1 fractures, 15 (12%) zone 2 fractures and 7 (6%) zone 3 fractures. At VFC, 125/126 were discharged. 12 patients (9.5%) arranged further follow-up after initial discharge; pain the reason in all cases. There was 1 non-union during the study period. Average MOXFQ score post 1 year was 0.4/64, with only 11 patients scoring more than 0. In total, 248 face-to-face clinic visits were saved. Our experience demonstrates that the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in the VFC setting, with a well-defined protocol, can prove safe,