A hybrid-capture approach to reconstruct the phylogeny of Scleractinia (Cnidaria: Hexacorallia)

• Published in: Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 2023-09, Vol.186, p.107867-107867, Article 107867
• Main Authors: Quek, Z.B. Randolph, Jain, Sudhanshi S., Richards, Zoe T., Arrigoni, Roberto, Benzoni, Francesca, Hoeksema, Bert W., Carvajal, Jose I., Wilson, Nerida G., Baird, Andrew H., Kitahara, Marcelo V., Seiblitz, Isabela G.L., Vaga, Claudia F., Huang, Danwei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anthozoa; Coral; Pachyseridae; Phylogenomics; Transcriptome; Tree of life
• ISSN: 1055-7903; 1095-9513
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107867

•Hybrid capture is a useful large-scale phylogenomic reconstructions.•We perform the largest phylogenomic reconstruction of Scleractinia.•Phylogenetic relationships are resolved, but paraphyletic families remain.•Taxonomic uncertainty is rife, and revisions are urgently required. A well-supported evolutionary tree representing most major lineages of scleractinian corals is in sight with the development and application of phylogenomic approaches. Specifically, hybrid-capture techniques are shedding light on the evolution and systematics of corals. Here, we reconstructed a broad phylogeny of Scleractinia to test previous phylogenetic hypotheses inferred from a few molecular markers, in particular, the relationships among major scleractinian families and genera, and to identify clades that require further research. We analysed 449 nuclear loci from 422 corals, comprising 266 species spanning 26 families, combining data across whole genomes, transcriptomes, hybrid capture and low-coverage sequencing to reconstruct the largest phylogenomic tree of scleractinians to date. Due to the large number of loci and data completeness (less than 38% missing data), node supports were high across shallow and deep nodes with incongruences observed in only a few shallow nodes. The “Robust” and “Complex” clades were recovered unequivocally, and our analyses confirmed that Micrabaciidae Vaughan, 1905 is sister to the “Robust” clade, transforming our understanding of the “Basal” clade. Several families remain polyphyletic in our phylogeny, including Deltocyathiidae Kitahara, Cairns, Stolarski & Miller, 2012, Caryophylliidae Dana, 1846, and Coscinaraeidae Benzoni, Arrigoni, Stefani & Stolarski, 2012, and we hereby formally proposed the family name Pachyseridae Benzoni & Hoeksema to accommodate Pachyseris Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849, which is phylogenetically distinct from Agariciidae Gray, 1847. Results also revealed species misidentifications and inconsistencies within morphologically complex clades, such as Acropora Oken, 1815 and Platygyra Ehrenberg, 1834, underscoring the need for reference skeletal material and topotypes, as well as the importance of detailed taxonomic work. The approach and findings here provide much promise for further stabilising the topology of the scleractinian tree of life and advancing our understanding of coral evolution.