Good convolutional codes for the precoded (1-D)(1+D)(n) partial-response channels

• Published in: IEEE transactions on information theory 1997-03, Vol.43 (2), p.441-453
• Main Authors: Uchoa Filho, B F, Herro, M A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0018-9448
• DOI: 10.1109/18.556104

We extend the coding technique for the 1-D channel, due to Wolf and Ungerboeck, to the case of the (1-D)(1 D)(n) channel. The technique employs a convolutional encoder, a precoder, and the channel in cascade. A computer-aided search for channel codes with large minimum free squared Euclidean distance, d(free)(2), is introduced. The search is limited to a class of convolutional encoders for which an encoder with constraint length nu generates a decoder trellis with 2(nu) states only, as opposed to 2(nu n 1 ) states obtained when a general convolutional encoder is used. These channel codes are said to be totally trellis-matched (TTM) to the (1-D)(1 D)(n) channel. A limitation on the maximum zero-run length, L(MAX) is attained by choosing a nontrivial coset of the convolutional code. A class of coset representatives from which the resulting run-length-limited channel codes are TTM is determined. While minimal encoders generate channel codes containing no flawed codewords, it is shown that some nonminimal encoders do the same while achieving larger dg(free)(2). Both types of encoders are considered in the search. Many new channel codes for the (1-D)(1 D)(2) and the (1-D)(1 D)(3) channels, with diverse rates and decoding complexities, are tabulated. The codes have relatively low decoding complexity for rates up to 0.8. Two of the new channel codes are compared to a matched spectral null (MSN) code. With the same decoding complexity and code rate, one of these two new channel codes has a smaller d(free)(2) and larger L(MA X) than the MSN code. However, with slightly higher decoding complexity, the second new channel code outperforms the MSN code