When the ends do not justify the means: Learning who is predicted to have harmful indirect effects

There is a growing literature on finding rules by which to assign treatment based on an individual's characteristics such that a desired outcome under the intervention is maximised. A related goal entails identifying a sub‐population of individuals predicted to have a harmful indirect effect (t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society Statistics in society, 2022-12, Vol.185 (Suppl 2), p.S573-S589
Main Authors: Rudolph, Kara E., Díaz, Iván
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
causal inference
cross‐validation
dynamic treatment regime
Environmental aspects
Housing
Identification methods
Indirect effects
interventional indirect effect
Learning
mediation
Mediators
Neighborhoods
optimal individualised treatment regime
optimal rule
Subgroups
Vouchers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is a growing literature on finding rules by which to assign treatment based on an individual's characteristics such that a desired outcome under the intervention is maximised. A related goal entails identifying a sub‐population of individuals predicted to have a harmful indirect effect (the effect of treatment on an outcome through mediators), perhaps even in the presence of a predicted beneficial total treatment effect. In some cases, the implications of a likely harmful indirect effect may outweigh an anticipated beneficial total treatment effect, and would motivate further discussion of whether to treat identified individuals. We build on the mediation and optimal treatment rule literatures to propose a method of identifying a subgroup for which the treatment effect through the mediator is expected to be harmful. Our approach is non‐parametric, incorporates post‐treatment confounders of the mediator–outcome relationship, and does not make restrictions on the distribution of baseline covariates, mediating variables or outcomes. We apply the proposed approach to identify a subgroup of boys in the Moving To Opportunity housing voucher experiment who are predicted to have a harmful indirect effect of housing voucher receipt on subsequent psychiatric disorder incidence through aspects of their school and neighbourhood environments.
ISSN:0964-1998
1467-985X
DOI:10.1111/rssa.12951