Assessing the exploratory profile of two zebrafish populations: Influence of anxiety-like phenotypes and independent trials on homebase-related parameters and exploration

• Published in: Behavioural processes 2023-08, Vol.210, p.104912-104912, Article 104912
• Main Authors: Resmim, Cássio M., Borba, João V., Pretzel, Camilla W., Santos, Laura W., Rubin, Maribel A., Rosemberg, Denis B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Homebase-related behaviors; Re-exposure to the context; Spatio-temporal exploration; Zebrafish populations
• ISSN: 0376-6357; 1872-8308
• DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104912

Anxiety is a protective behavior when animals face aversive conditions. The open field test (OFT) is used to assess the spatio-temporal dynamics of exploration, in which both homebase formation and recognition of environmental cues may reflect habituation to unfamiliar conditions. Because emotional- and affective-like states influence exploration patterns and mnemonic aspects, we aimed to verify whether the exploratory behaviors of two zebrafish populations showing distinct baselines of anxiety differ in two OFT sessions. Firstly, we assessed the baseline anxiety-like responses of short fin (SF) and leopard (LEO) populations using the novel tank test (NTT) and light-dark test (LDT) in 6-min trials. Fish were later tested in two consecutive days in the OFT, where the spatial occupancy and exploratory profile were analyzed for 30 min. In general, LEO showed pronounced diving behavior and scototaxis in the NTT and LDT, respectively, in which an “anxiety index” corroborated their exacerbated anxiety-like behavior. In the OFT, the SF population spent less time to establish the homebase in the 1st trial, while only LEO showed a markedly reduction in the latency to homebase formation in the 2nd trial. Both locomotion and homebase-related activities were decreased in the 2nd trial, in which animals also revealed increased occupancy in the center area of the apparatus. Moreover, we verified a significant percentage of homebase conservation for both populations, while only SF showed reduced the number of trips and increased the average length of trips. Principal component analyses revealed that distinct factors accounted for total variances between trials for each population tested. While homebase exploration was reduced in the 2nd trial for SF, an increased occupancy in the center area and hypolocomotion were the main factors that contribute to the effects observed in LEO during re-exposure to the OFT. In conclusion, our novel data support the homebase conservation in zebrafish subjected to independent OFT sessions, as well as corroborate a population-dependent effect on specific behavioral parameters related to exploration. •We assessed the spatio-temporal exploratory profiles of two zebrafish populations.•Leopard has higher latency to homebase formation than the short-fin population.•Re-exposure to the open field changes locomotion and homebase-related activities.•Zebrafish show a high degree of homebase conservation during retrial.•The spatio-temporal dynamics o