Loading…

Evaluation of quality of care in neonatal anesthesia using a bundle of intraoperative parameters

Background Maintenance of physiological homeostasis is key in the safe conduct of pediatric anesthesia. Achieving this goal is especially difficult in neonatal surgery. Aims The first aim was to document the absolute number of seven intraoperative parameters monitored during anesthesia in neonates u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric anesthesia 2023-10, Vol.33 (10), p.823-828
Main Authors: Salaün, Jean‐Philippe, Beaufils, Roxane, Chagnot, Audrey, Alexandre, Cénéric, Petit, Thierry, Hanouz, Jean‐Luc, Orliaguet, Gilles
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Maintenance of physiological homeostasis is key in the safe conduct of pediatric anesthesia. Achieving this goal is especially difficult in neonatal surgery. Aims The first aim was to document the absolute number of seven intraoperative parameters monitored during anesthesia in neonates undergoing gastroschisis surgery. The second aims were to determine the frequency of monitoring of each of these intraoperative parameters as well as the proportion of cases in which each parameter was both monitored and maintained within a pre‐defined range. Methods This retrospective observational analysis includes data from 53 gastroschisis surgeries performed at Caen University Hospital (2009–2020). Seven intraoperative parameters were analyzed. First, we assessed if the intraoperative parameters were monitored or not. Second, when monitored, we assessed if these parameters were maintained within a pre‐defined range, based on the current literature and on local agreement. Results The median [first–third Q], range (min–max) number of intraoperative parameters monitored during the 53 gastroschisis surgeries was 6 [5–6], range (4–7). There were no missing data for the automatically recorded ones such as arterial blood pressure, heart rate, end‐tidal CO2, and oxygen saturation. Temperature was monitored in 38% of the patients, glycemia in 66%, and natremia in 68% of the cases. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were maintained within the pre‐defined range in 96% and 81% of the cases respectively. The blood pressure (28%) and temperature (30%) were instead the least often maintained within the pre‐defined range. Conclusion Although a median of six out of the seven selected intraoperative parameters were monitored during gastroschisis repair, only two of them (oxygen saturation and heart rate) were maintained within the pre‐defined range more than 80% of the time. It might be of interest to extend physiologic age‐ and procedure‐based approach to the development of specific preoperative anesthetic planning.
ISSN:1155-5645
1460-9592
DOI:10.1111/pan.14719