Loading…

Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study

Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2023-09, Vol.41 (39), p.5769-5774
Main Authors: Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa, Weckx, Lily Yin, de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel, Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira, Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto, Spina, Fernanda Garcia, de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço, Clemens, Ralf, Clemens, Sue Ann Costa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33
container_end_page 5774
container_issue 39
container_start_page 5769
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 41
creator Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa
Weckx, Lily Yin
de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel
Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira
Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto
Spina, Fernanda Garcia
de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço
Clemens, Ralf
Clemens, Sue Ann Costa
description Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination. Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: 50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and > 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level. 331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG > 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2850307169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2850307169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIl6dhe2zG3UlFAqtQeQOJmuc5k61U2bm2nUnkD3hqnu3Dg5LH0_Z9m9BPylkHLgKmzbfvovA8Tthy4aKFrAboXZMU6LRouWfeSrICrdbNm8POYnOS8BQApmHlFjoWWWnBgK_L7BlOZcw6ZuqmE29gHXMae7vWuhDhRHx8xuQ1St4vTht6hG8uddwnpfYoD1nic3JhpmOin5H6FkYbl43p8mF3Bj_Sc-hRzbjL68szSjCmOcRP8Mpe5f3pNjobqwDeH95T8uPz8_eJrc3X95dvF-VXjhdCl8b3iAIJx7PRaotBCe-Ok70EYboQRyhjhGQyKCe5Qas9kb8Sghx7VUB2n5MPeW1d_mDEXuwvZ4zi6CeOcLe8kCNBMmYq-_w_dxjktl1ZKcS0VMKiU3FPPJyYc7H0KO5eeLAO7dGW39tCVXbqy0NnaVc29O9jn2x32_1J_yxF_AO9glDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862756010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa ; Weckx, Lily Yin ; de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel ; Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira ; Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto ; Spina, Fernanda Garcia ; de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço ; Clemens, Ralf ; Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa ; Weckx, Lily Yin ; de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel ; Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira ; Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto ; Spina, Fernanda Garcia ; de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço ; Clemens, Ralf ; Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination. Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: &lt;10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; &gt;50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and &gt; 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level. 331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG &gt; 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p &lt; 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001). Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37573201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Chi-square test ; Confidence intervals ; Diphtheria ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Immunization ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulins ; Infections ; Medical personnel ; Pertussis ; Pertussis toxin ; Regression analysis ; Serology ; Sociodemographics ; Statistical analysis ; Tetanus ; Toxins ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2023-09, Vol.41 (39), p.5769-5774</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4685-4207</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37573201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weckx, Lily Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creatorcontrib><title>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination. Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: &lt;10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; &gt;50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and &gt; 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level. 331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG &gt; 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p &lt; 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001). Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diphtheria</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Pertussis</subject><subject>Pertussis toxin</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tetanus</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIl6dhe2zG3UlFAqtQeQOJmuc5k61U2bm2nUnkD3hqnu3Dg5LH0_Z9m9BPylkHLgKmzbfvovA8Tthy4aKFrAboXZMU6LRouWfeSrICrdbNm8POYnOS8BQApmHlFjoWWWnBgK_L7BlOZcw6ZuqmE29gHXMae7vWuhDhRHx8xuQ1St4vTht6hG8uddwnpfYoD1nic3JhpmOin5H6FkYbl43p8mF3Bj_Sc-hRzbjL68szSjCmOcRP8Mpe5f3pNjobqwDeH95T8uPz8_eJrc3X95dvF-VXjhdCl8b3iAIJx7PRaotBCe-Ok70EYboQRyhjhGQyKCe5Qas9kb8Sghx7VUB2n5MPeW1d_mDEXuwvZ4zi6CeOcLe8kCNBMmYq-_w_dxjktl1ZKcS0VMKiU3FPPJyYc7H0KO5eeLAO7dGW39tCVXbqy0NnaVc29O9jn2x32_1J_yxF_AO9glDA</recordid><startdate>20230907</startdate><enddate>20230907</enddate><creator>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</creator><creator>Weckx, Lily Yin</creator><creator>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</creator><creator>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</creator><creator>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</creator><creator>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</creator><creator>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</creator><creator>Clemens, Ralf</creator><creator>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-4207</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230907</creationdate><title>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</title><author>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa ; Weckx, Lily Yin ; de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel ; Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira ; Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto ; Spina, Fernanda Garcia ; de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço ; Clemens, Ralf ; Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diphtheria</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Pertussis</topic><topic>Pertussis toxin</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tetanus</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weckx, Lily Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</au><au>Weckx, Lily Yin</au><au>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</au><au>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</au><au>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</au><au>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</au><au>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</au><au>Clemens, Ralf</au><au>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2023-09-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>5769</spage><epage>5774</epage><pages>5769-5774</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination. Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: &lt;10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; &gt;50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and &gt; 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level. 331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG &gt; 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p &lt; 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001). Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>37573201</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-4207</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2023-09, Vol.41 (39), p.5769-5774
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2850307169
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Antibodies
Chi-square test
Confidence intervals
Diphtheria
Health care
Hospitals
Immunization
Immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulins
Infections
Medical personnel
Pertussis
Pertussis toxin
Regression analysis
Serology
Sociodemographics
Statistical analysis
Tetanus
Toxins
Vaccination
Vaccines
Whooping cough
title Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pertussis%20antibodies%20and%20vaccination%20coverage%20among%20healthcare%20professionals%20in%20Brazil%20is%20inadequate:%20A%20cross-sectional%20serological%20study&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Cardona,%20Rita%20Soares%20Barbosa&rft.date=2023-09-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=5769&rft.epage=5774&rft.pages=5769-5774&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2850307169%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862756010&rft_id=info:pmid/37573201&rfr_iscdi=true