Loading…
Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study
Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalenc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vaccine 2023-09, Vol.41 (39), p.5769-5774 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33 |
container_end_page | 5774 |
container_issue | 39 |
container_start_page | 5769 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa Weckx, Lily Yin de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto Spina, Fernanda Garcia de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço Clemens, Ralf Clemens, Sue Ann Costa |
description | Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination.
Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: 50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and > 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level.
331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG > 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2850307169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2850307169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIl6dhe2zG3UlFAqtQeQOJmuc5k61U2bm2nUnkD3hqnu3Dg5LH0_Z9m9BPylkHLgKmzbfvovA8Tthy4aKFrAboXZMU6LRouWfeSrICrdbNm8POYnOS8BQApmHlFjoWWWnBgK_L7BlOZcw6ZuqmE29gHXMae7vWuhDhRHx8xuQ1St4vTht6hG8uddwnpfYoD1nic3JhpmOin5H6FkYbl43p8mF3Bj_Sc-hRzbjL68szSjCmOcRP8Mpe5f3pNjobqwDeH95T8uPz8_eJrc3X95dvF-VXjhdCl8b3iAIJx7PRaotBCe-Ok70EYboQRyhjhGQyKCe5Qas9kb8Sghx7VUB2n5MPeW1d_mDEXuwvZ4zi6CeOcLe8kCNBMmYq-_w_dxjktl1ZKcS0VMKiU3FPPJyYc7H0KO5eeLAO7dGW39tCVXbqy0NnaVc29O9jn2x32_1J_yxF_AO9glDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862756010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa ; Weckx, Lily Yin ; de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel ; Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira ; Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto ; Spina, Fernanda Garcia ; de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço ; Clemens, Ralf ; Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa ; Weckx, Lily Yin ; de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel ; Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira ; Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto ; Spina, Fernanda Garcia ; de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço ; Clemens, Ralf ; Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination.
Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: <10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; >50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and > 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level.
331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG > 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p < 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001).
Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37573201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Chi-square test ; Confidence intervals ; Diphtheria ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Immunization ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulins ; Infections ; Medical personnel ; Pertussis ; Pertussis toxin ; Regression analysis ; Serology ; Sociodemographics ; Statistical analysis ; Tetanus ; Toxins ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2023-09, Vol.41 (39), p.5769-5774</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4685-4207</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37573201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weckx, Lily Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creatorcontrib><title>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination.
Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: <10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; >50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and > 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level.
331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG > 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p < 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001).
Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diphtheria</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Pertussis</subject><subject>Pertussis toxin</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tetanus</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIl6dhe2zG3UlFAqtQeQOJmuc5k61U2bm2nUnkD3hqnu3Dg5LH0_Z9m9BPylkHLgKmzbfvovA8Tthy4aKFrAboXZMU6LRouWfeSrICrdbNm8POYnOS8BQApmHlFjoWWWnBgK_L7BlOZcw6ZuqmE29gHXMae7vWuhDhRHx8xuQ1St4vTht6hG8uddwnpfYoD1nic3JhpmOin5H6FkYbl43p8mF3Bj_Sc-hRzbjL68szSjCmOcRP8Mpe5f3pNjobqwDeH95T8uPz8_eJrc3X95dvF-VXjhdCl8b3iAIJx7PRaotBCe-Ok70EYboQRyhjhGQyKCe5Qas9kb8Sghx7VUB2n5MPeW1d_mDEXuwvZ4zi6CeOcLe8kCNBMmYq-_w_dxjktl1ZKcS0VMKiU3FPPJyYc7H0KO5eeLAO7dGW39tCVXbqy0NnaVc29O9jn2x32_1J_yxF_AO9glDA</recordid><startdate>20230907</startdate><enddate>20230907</enddate><creator>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</creator><creator>Weckx, Lily Yin</creator><creator>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</creator><creator>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</creator><creator>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</creator><creator>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</creator><creator>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</creator><creator>Clemens, Ralf</creator><creator>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-4207</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230907</creationdate><title>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</title><author>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa ; Weckx, Lily Yin ; de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel ; Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira ; Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto ; Spina, Fernanda Garcia ; de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço ; Clemens, Ralf ; Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diphtheria</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Pertussis</topic><topic>Pertussis toxin</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tetanus</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weckx, Lily Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardona, Rita Soares Barbosa</au><au>Weckx, Lily Yin</au><au>de Moraes-Pinto, Maria Isabel</au><au>Ramos, Bárbara Cristina Ferreira</au><au>Dos Santos, Andréia Regina Augusto</au><au>Spina, Fernanda Garcia</au><au>de Araújo, Beatriz Collaço</au><au>Clemens, Ralf</au><au>Clemens, Sue Ann Costa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2023-09-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>5769</spage><epage>5774</epage><pages>5769-5774</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination.
Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: <10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; >50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and > 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsońs correlation, at 5% p-level.
331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG > 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p < 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001).
Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>37573201</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-4207</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2023-09, Vol.41 (39), p.5769-5774 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2850307169 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Antibodies Chi-square test Confidence intervals Diphtheria Health care Hospitals Immunization Immunoglobulin G Immunoglobulins Infections Medical personnel Pertussis Pertussis toxin Regression analysis Serology Sociodemographics Statistical analysis Tetanus Toxins Vaccination Vaccines Whooping cough |
title | Pertussis antibodies and vaccination coverage among healthcare professionals in Brazil is inadequate: A cross-sectional serological study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pertussis%20antibodies%20and%20vaccination%20coverage%20among%20healthcare%20professionals%20in%20Brazil%20is%20inadequate:%20A%20cross-sectional%20serological%20study&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Cardona,%20Rita%20Soares%20Barbosa&rft.date=2023-09-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=5769&rft.epage=5774&rft.pages=5769-5774&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2850307169%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cd6200312e8745e3737c9a5cd039293936993c10f6132ae57c15d93f7fde6fc33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862756010&rft_id=info:pmid/37573201&rfr_iscdi=true |