Loading…

Anatomical study and proposed EMG technique for the cervical paraspinal muscles

Paraspinal electromyography has proven to be the most sensitive component of the electrodiagnostic examination for lumbar spinal disorders. However, no standardized, anatomically validated technique has been proposed for the cervical region. This study reviewed the published textbooks on cervical pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PM & R 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.165-173
Main Authors: Haig, Andrew J., McGuire, Tyler J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Paraspinal electromyography has proven to be the most sensitive component of the electrodiagnostic examination for lumbar spinal disorders. However, no standardized, anatomically validated technique has been proposed for the cervical region. This study reviewed the published textbooks on cervical paraspinal anatomy to develop a standardized electromyography technique and scoring system. A library search found 32 anatomy texts published between 2000 and 2021. Of these 11 were unique and appropriate. Most texts described the basic muscle anatomy similarly, but only one cited original research. When the spinous process is defined as the origin, the multifidus and deeper rotatores appear innervated by the posterior primary rami of single cervical roots. However, texts differ in the number of pennae, between two and five, traveling to transverse process regions below. These are crowded into a small area between the spinous processes and transverse processes. Based on this understanding, a proposed cervical paraspinal mapping technique involves skin insertions from 1 to 2 cm lateral to the C5, C7, and T2 spinous processes. The needle samples transversely and deep toward midline, contacts bone, then is withdrawn and redirected to sample medial and caudally to midline to bone, creating two scores of 0–4 at three levels, theoretically resulting in scores of 0–24. This technique must be validated by clinical research to determine the range of normal, reproducibility, and the spectrum of findings in various disorders.
ISSN:1934-1482
1934-1563
DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13046