Loading…

Placebo response of sham acupuncture in patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A meta-analysis

The placebo response of sham acupuncture in patients with primary dysmenorrhea is a substantial factor associated with analgesia. However, the magnitude of the placebo response is unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the effects of sham acupuncture in patients with primary dysmenorrhea and the facto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of integrative medicine 2023-09, Vol.21 (5), p.455-463
Main Authors: Sun, Chong-yang, Xiong, Zhi-yi, Sun, Cheng-yi, Ma, Pei-hong, Liu, Xiao-yu, Sun, Chi-yun, Xin, Ze-yin, Liu, Bao-yan, Liu, Cun-zhi, Yan, Shi-yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The placebo response of sham acupuncture in patients with primary dysmenorrhea is a substantial factor associated with analgesia. However, the magnitude of the placebo response is unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the effects of sham acupuncture in patients with primary dysmenorrhea and the factors contributing to these effects. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception up to August 20, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using sham acupuncture as a control for female patients of reproductive age with primary dysmenorrhea were included. Pain intensity, retrospective symptom scale, and health-related quality of life were outcome measures used in these trials. Placebo response was defined as the change in the outcome of interest from baseline to endpoint. We used standardized mean difference (SMD) to estimate the effect size of the placebo response. Thirteen RCTs were included. The pooled placebo response size for pain intensity was the largest (SMD = −0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.31 to −0.68), followed by the retrospective symptom scale (Total frequency rating score: SMD = −0.20; 95% CI, −0.80 to −0.39. Average severity score: SMD = −0.35; 95% CI, −0.90 to −0.20) and physical component of SF-36 (SMD = 0.27; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.72). Studies using blunt-tip needles, single-center trials, studies with a low risk of bias, studies in which patients had a longer disease course, studies in which clinicians had 
ISSN:2095-4964
DOI:10.1016/j.joim.2023.08.005