Loading…

Assessment of the Palatability and Acceptability of Hempseed Meal Pellets in Horses Compared to Mainstream Feedstuffs

•Hempseed meal (HSM) pellets are more palatable than soybean meal and beet pulp pellets.•Rice bran pellets and HSM pellets have similar palatability.•Bucket lateralization does not correspond to increased feed intake.•Acceptance of HSM pellets increases after four days of exposure.•HSM pellet consum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of equine veterinary science 2023-12, Vol.131, p.104929, Article 104929
Main Authors: Springer, Ryon W., Mason, A. Cheyenne, Cross, Teighlor D., Guay, Kimberly A., Raub, Randel H., Wellmann, Kimberly B., Jones, Trinette N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Hempseed meal (HSM) pellets are more palatable than soybean meal and beet pulp pellets.•Rice bran pellets and HSM pellets have similar palatability.•Bucket lateralization does not correspond to increased feed intake.•Acceptance of HSM pellets increases after four days of exposure.•HSM pellet consumption is not correlated to hay consumption. With greater availability of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) due to recent legislation, hempseed meal (HSM) should be evaluated as a potential feedstuff for livestock. The study objective was to evaluate the palatability of HSM in horses. Trial 1 used a modified 3 × 3 Latin Square design utilizing three geldings and three mares. Feeding periods (6d) consisted of two feedings/d with a washout phase (3d) before each treatment phase (3d). During treatment, horses were offered soybean meal pellets (SBM), rice bran pellets (RBP), or beet pulp pellets (BPP) in one bucket (500 g) and HSM in a second bucket (500 g) each feeding. In Trial 2, six geldings were offered 1 kg of HSM pellets over two 5-minute periods, 1 hour apart each day, with 1kg of Coastal Bermudagrass hay between offerings. Consumption of HSM in Trial 1 was greater than SBM (P = .005) and BPP (P < .001) but not different from RBP (P = .19). Consumption of HSM increased with each subsequent period (P < .001). In Trial 2, intake of HSM on d1, d2, and d3 were less than d6 (P < .05). Hay consumption was greater on d1 and d2 than d6 (P < .01). Hay consumption and HSM intake were not correlated (R2 = 0.001). These findings indicate that HSM may be similar in palatability to RBP and more palatable than SBM and BPP. Consumption of HSM increases over time, but is not impacted by hay consumption. In equine rations, HSM may serve as an acceptable replacement to more common feedstuffs.
ISSN:0737-0806
1542-7412
DOI:10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104929