Mental health outcomes for those who have offended and have been given a Mental Health Treatment Requirement as part of a Community Order in England and Wales

• Published in: Criminal behaviour and mental health 2023-10, Vol.33 (5), p.386-396
• Main Authors: Callender, Matthew, Sanna, Greta Arancia, Cahalin, Kathryn
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Anxiety disorders; Changes; Clinical outcomes; Clinical psychologists; Clinical significance; Community; Courts; Criminal justice; Criminal justice system; Criminal sentences; Generalized anxiety disorder; Health problems; Health status; Intervention; Measures; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental health care; Mental health services; Multiple sites; Offenders; Offenses; Primary care; Probation; Probation service; Psychological distress; Psychotherapy; Recidivism; Treatment outcomes
• ISSN: 0957-9664; 1471-2857
• DOI: 10.1002/cbm.2312

BackgroundGrowing evidence of mental disorders among people going through the criminal justice system suggests the potential benefit of courts adding a Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR) when sentencing an offender to a Community Order (sentence) in England and Wales. Although available since 2003, MHTRs have not been widely used, and there is little evidence on outcomes.AimTo conduct the first large‐scale evaluation of mental health outcomes of people with an MHTR as part of their community sentence across multiple sites in England and Wales.MethodsData were collected from 14 sites in England and Wales about individuals who were given an MHTR as part of a community sentence. They were assessed before and after this. During the MHTR, they received a psychotherapeutic intervention by assistant psychologists in a primary care framework. Measures of psychological distress (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation—Outcome Measure), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder‐7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire) were completed before the MHTR was implemented and after completion.ResultsWhere paired sample t‐tests and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests were used, with samples ranging between 309 and 447 individuals, clinically significant changes were obtained for all measures. Most individuals (63%) were identified as experiencing a reliable change in at least two out of the three scales. Finally, a negative linear relationship, between measures at the start of the intervention and reliable change, was identified with higher pre‐measures, indicating that more initial distress, anxiety and/or depression were associated with more sizeable changes.ConclusionsThis paper provides the first substantial evidence in support of the MHTR within a primary mental healthcare framework as an effective pathway to reduce mental health problems among individuals under probation supervision as part of a sentence after conviction for a criminal offence. This supports the expansion of the provision across England and Wales. Future research should take account of the non‐completers and explore the relationship between the MHTR, mental health improvements and reoffending.