Loading…

“I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me.” The categorization and moralization of food

Intuitive eating emphasizes eating in response to physiological cues of hunger and satiety and is associated with multiple positive health outcomes. Unconditional permission to eat (UPE), a domain of intuitive eating, encourages removing food classifications and permission to eat all foods. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Appetite 2023-12, Vol.191, p.107071, Article 107071
Main Authors: Jackson, Alexandra Malia, Iniguez, Anaderi, Min, Hyun Jeong, Strickland, Megan, Lanigan, Jane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1cb5ade6e78e55bc62c65ddae99307d1fa2061d0f93008c938ddc31caa6619673
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107071
container_title Appetite
container_volume 191
creator Jackson, Alexandra Malia
Iniguez, Anaderi
Min, Hyun Jeong
Strickland, Megan
Lanigan, Jane
description Intuitive eating emphasizes eating in response to physiological cues of hunger and satiety and is associated with multiple positive health outcomes. Unconditional permission to eat (UPE), a domain of intuitive eating, encourages removing food classifications and permission to eat all foods. However, the categorization of food is described as a method to simplify decision making and moralization of foods can help prioritize food items in consumption. Thus, we were interested in understanding how foods are labeled and applied, the moralization of foods, and how individuals with low UPE labeled and moralize foods. Using Prolific Academic, we recruited 49 adults 18 years and older living in the United States to complete an online survey and interview. The survey assessed intuitive eating (IES-2) and the interview explored what and how participants eat and their thoughts and feelings about their body. Participants frequently used multiple labels when talking about foods. Healthy and unhealthy were common and offered a rationale for consumption, emotions were used to label foods, and taste and cost were important to food choice. Participants frequently moralized foods, although three participants explicitly stated they choose not to moralize foods. Individuals reporting low UPE described the importance of restriction and were following strict dietary recommendations. While labeling foods has been proposed to simplify decision-making, the use of labels is highly nuanced and thus understanding the connections between how foods are labeled and behaviors may be highly complex. We suggest future research explore how the categorization and moralization of food are associated with health behaviors and outcomes, how differing definitions of “healthy/unhealthy” foods are associated with behaviors, and the impacts of food insecurity and chronic disease management on food categorization and moralization.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107071
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2872807748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195666323025333</els_id><sourcerecordid>2872807748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1cb5ade6e78e55bc62c65ddae99307d1fa2061d0f93008c938ddc31caa6619673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOGzEQhi1UBGngCZAqH3townidtb2HHqqoBSQkLuFsOfYscdhdp_YGFE48SHk5nqQOIRy5jGdG3_-P_BNyxmDMgInz5disVtiPCyh43kiQ7IAMGFTlSHGYfCEDYLkXQvBj8jWlJQDwUsojcsylVEryyYDcvz7_u6LYLcOG9gukdyE4WueSflDTNDTU9HHh7YKaiLQL_R6ItMXx6_MLnWWRNT3eheifTO9DR03naBuiafaLbLK1PCGHtWkSnr6_Q3L75_dsejm6vrm4mv66HlkOVT9idl4ahwKlwrKcW1FYUTpnsKo4SMdqU4BgDuo8grIVV85ZzqwxQrBKSD4k33e-qxj-rjH1uvXJYtOYDsM66ULJQoGUE5VRvkNtDClFrPUq-tbEjWagtynrpX5LWW9T1ruUs-rb-4H1vEX3odnHmoGfOwDzNx88Rp2sx86i8xFtr13wnx74D2_0kJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2872807748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me.” The categorization and moralization of food</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jackson, Alexandra Malia ; Iniguez, Anaderi ; Min, Hyun Jeong ; Strickland, Megan ; Lanigan, Jane</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Alexandra Malia ; Iniguez, Anaderi ; Min, Hyun Jeong ; Strickland, Megan ; Lanigan, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Intuitive eating emphasizes eating in response to physiological cues of hunger and satiety and is associated with multiple positive health outcomes. Unconditional permission to eat (UPE), a domain of intuitive eating, encourages removing food classifications and permission to eat all foods. However, the categorization of food is described as a method to simplify decision making and moralization of foods can help prioritize food items in consumption. Thus, we were interested in understanding how foods are labeled and applied, the moralization of foods, and how individuals with low UPE labeled and moralize foods. Using Prolific Academic, we recruited 49 adults 18 years and older living in the United States to complete an online survey and interview. The survey assessed intuitive eating (IES-2) and the interview explored what and how participants eat and their thoughts and feelings about their body. Participants frequently used multiple labels when talking about foods. Healthy and unhealthy were common and offered a rationale for consumption, emotions were used to label foods, and taste and cost were important to food choice. Participants frequently moralized foods, although three participants explicitly stated they choose not to moralize foods. Individuals reporting low UPE described the importance of restriction and were following strict dietary recommendations. While labeling foods has been proposed to simplify decision-making, the use of labels is highly nuanced and thus understanding the connections between how foods are labeled and behaviors may be highly complex. We suggest future research explore how the categorization and moralization of food are associated with health behaviors and outcomes, how differing definitions of “healthy/unhealthy” foods are associated with behaviors, and the impacts of food insecurity and chronic disease management on food categorization and moralization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6663</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1095-8304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37788734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Choice Behavior ; Diet, Healthy - psychology ; Eating - psychology ; Emotions ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Female ; Food categorization ; Food Labeling - methods ; Food Preferences - psychology ; Humans ; Intuition ; Intuitive eating ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Moralization ; Morals ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Appetite, 2023-12, Vol.191, p.107071, Article 107071</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1cb5ade6e78e55bc62c65ddae99307d1fa2061d0f93008c938ddc31caa6619673</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4423-1292</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Alexandra Malia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iniguez, Anaderi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Hyun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanigan, Jane</creatorcontrib><title>“I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me.” The categorization and moralization of food</title><title>Appetite</title><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><description>Intuitive eating emphasizes eating in response to physiological cues of hunger and satiety and is associated with multiple positive health outcomes. Unconditional permission to eat (UPE), a domain of intuitive eating, encourages removing food classifications and permission to eat all foods. However, the categorization of food is described as a method to simplify decision making and moralization of foods can help prioritize food items in consumption. Thus, we were interested in understanding how foods are labeled and applied, the moralization of foods, and how individuals with low UPE labeled and moralize foods. Using Prolific Academic, we recruited 49 adults 18 years and older living in the United States to complete an online survey and interview. The survey assessed intuitive eating (IES-2) and the interview explored what and how participants eat and their thoughts and feelings about their body. Participants frequently used multiple labels when talking about foods. Healthy and unhealthy were common and offered a rationale for consumption, emotions were used to label foods, and taste and cost were important to food choice. Participants frequently moralized foods, although three participants explicitly stated they choose not to moralize foods. Individuals reporting low UPE described the importance of restriction and were following strict dietary recommendations. While labeling foods has been proposed to simplify decision-making, the use of labels is highly nuanced and thus understanding the connections between how foods are labeled and behaviors may be highly complex. We suggest future research explore how the categorization and moralization of food are associated with health behaviors and outcomes, how differing definitions of “healthy/unhealthy” foods are associated with behaviors, and the impacts of food insecurity and chronic disease management on food categorization and moralization.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Diet, Healthy - psychology</subject><subject>Eating - psychology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food categorization</subject><subject>Food Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Food Preferences - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Intuitive eating</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Moralization</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0195-6663</issn><issn>1095-8304</issn><issn>1095-8304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOGzEQhi1UBGngCZAqH3townidtb2HHqqoBSQkLuFsOfYscdhdp_YGFE48SHk5nqQOIRy5jGdG3_-P_BNyxmDMgInz5disVtiPCyh43kiQ7IAMGFTlSHGYfCEDYLkXQvBj8jWlJQDwUsojcsylVEryyYDcvz7_u6LYLcOG9gukdyE4WueSflDTNDTU9HHh7YKaiLQL_R6ItMXx6_MLnWWRNT3eheifTO9DR03naBuiafaLbLK1PCGHtWkSnr6_Q3L75_dsejm6vrm4mv66HlkOVT9idl4ahwKlwrKcW1FYUTpnsKo4SMdqU4BgDuo8grIVV85ZzqwxQrBKSD4k33e-qxj-rjH1uvXJYtOYDsM66ULJQoGUE5VRvkNtDClFrPUq-tbEjWagtynrpX5LWW9T1ruUs-rb-4H1vEX3odnHmoGfOwDzNx88Rp2sx86i8xFtr13wnx74D2_0kJ0</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Jackson, Alexandra Malia</creator><creator>Iniguez, Anaderi</creator><creator>Min, Hyun Jeong</creator><creator>Strickland, Megan</creator><creator>Lanigan, Jane</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-1292</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>“I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me.” The categorization and moralization of food</title><author>Jackson, Alexandra Malia ; Iniguez, Anaderi ; Min, Hyun Jeong ; Strickland, Megan ; Lanigan, Jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1cb5ade6e78e55bc62c65ddae99307d1fa2061d0f93008c938ddc31caa6619673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Diet, Healthy - psychology</topic><topic>Eating - psychology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food categorization</topic><topic>Food Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Food Preferences - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Intuitive eating</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Moralization</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Alexandra Malia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iniguez, Anaderi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Hyun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanigan, Jane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Alexandra Malia</au><au>Iniguez, Anaderi</au><au>Min, Hyun Jeong</au><au>Strickland, Megan</au><au>Lanigan, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me.” The categorization and moralization of food</atitle><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>191</volume><spage>107071</spage><pages>107071-</pages><artnum>107071</artnum><issn>0195-6663</issn><issn>1095-8304</issn><eissn>1095-8304</eissn><abstract>Intuitive eating emphasizes eating in response to physiological cues of hunger and satiety and is associated with multiple positive health outcomes. Unconditional permission to eat (UPE), a domain of intuitive eating, encourages removing food classifications and permission to eat all foods. However, the categorization of food is described as a method to simplify decision making and moralization of foods can help prioritize food items in consumption. Thus, we were interested in understanding how foods are labeled and applied, the moralization of foods, and how individuals with low UPE labeled and moralize foods. Using Prolific Academic, we recruited 49 adults 18 years and older living in the United States to complete an online survey and interview. The survey assessed intuitive eating (IES-2) and the interview explored what and how participants eat and their thoughts and feelings about their body. Participants frequently used multiple labels when talking about foods. Healthy and unhealthy were common and offered a rationale for consumption, emotions were used to label foods, and taste and cost were important to food choice. Participants frequently moralized foods, although three participants explicitly stated they choose not to moralize foods. Individuals reporting low UPE described the importance of restriction and were following strict dietary recommendations. While labeling foods has been proposed to simplify decision-making, the use of labels is highly nuanced and thus understanding the connections between how foods are labeled and behaviors may be highly complex. We suggest future research explore how the categorization and moralization of food are associated with health behaviors and outcomes, how differing definitions of “healthy/unhealthy” foods are associated with behaviors, and the impacts of food insecurity and chronic disease management on food categorization and moralization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37788734</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.appet.2023.107071</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-1292</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6663
ispartof Appetite, 2023-12, Vol.191, p.107071, Article 107071
issn 0195-6663
1095-8304
1095-8304
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2872807748
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Choice Behavior
Diet, Healthy - psychology
Eating - psychology
Emotions
Feeding Behavior - psychology
Female
Food categorization
Food Labeling - methods
Food Preferences - psychology
Humans
Intuition
Intuitive eating
Male
Middle Aged
Moralization
Morals
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Young Adult
title “I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me.” The categorization and moralization of food
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A36%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CI%20enjoy%20the%20good%20foods,%20all%20of%20which%20are%20not%20good%20for%20me.%E2%80%9D%20The%20categorization%20and%20moralization%20of%20food&rft.jtitle=Appetite&rft.au=Jackson,%20Alexandra%20Malia&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=191&rft.spage=107071&rft.pages=107071-&rft.artnum=107071&rft.issn=0195-6663&rft.eissn=1095-8304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.appet.2023.107071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2872807748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1cb5ade6e78e55bc62c65ddae99307d1fa2061d0f93008c938ddc31caa6619673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2872807748&rft_id=info:pmid/37788734&rfr_iscdi=true