Comparison of patient‐centered outcomes measures between low‐speed drilling without irrigation and high‐speed drilling with irrigation: A randomized clinical trial

Objective To compare patient satisfaction during surgery, postoperative pain and inflammation and quality of life between high‐speed drilling with irrigation and low‐speed drilling without irrigation for implant bed preparation. Materials and Methods Sixty‐six posterior single edentulous patients we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral implants research 2024-01, Vol.35 (1), p.21-30
Main Authors: Bernabeu‐Mira, Juan Carlos, Peñarrocha‐Diago, Miguel, Peñarrocha‐Diago, María, Romero‐Gavilán, Francisco, Camacho‐Alonso, Fabio, Peñarrocha‐Oltra, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical trials
Comfort
Correlation
dental implant
Dental implants
Drilling
Drowning
Humans
Inflammation
Irrigation
Lavage
low‐speed
Pain
Pain perception
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Patient satisfaction
Patient-Centered Care
Patients
quality life
Quality of Life
satisfaction
Sensation
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Temporal perception
Therapeutic Irrigation - methods
Vibration
Vibration perception
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To compare patient satisfaction during surgery, postoperative pain and inflammation and quality of life between high‐speed drilling with irrigation and low‐speed drilling without irrigation for implant bed preparation. Materials and Methods Sixty‐six posterior single edentulous patients were included in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Implant beds were created using high‐speed drilling with irrigation (control group) or low‐speed drilling without irrigation (test group). Patient satisfaction during surgery (in relation to drilling‐time perception, vibration, pressure, noise, comfort, and drowning sensation) and postoperative pain and inflammation were evaluated using a 100‐mm visual analogue scale (VAS)‐based questionnaire. Quality of life was analyzed with a Likert scale (in relation to mouth opening, chewing, speaking, sleeping, daily routine, and job). The follow‐up period was 7 days. Results Patient satisfaction in relation to drilling‐time perception, vibration, pressure, and noise did not show statistically significant differences (p > .05). The highest scores of drowning sensation (p 
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/clr.14189