Grazing management impacts on ecosystem services under contrasting climatic conditions in Texas and North Dakota

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2023-12, Vol.347, p.119213-119213, Article 119213
• Main Authors: Kim, JungJin, Ale, Srinivasulu, Kreuter, Urs P., Teague, W. Richard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptive multi-paddock grazing; Continuous grazing; Provisioning services; Regulating services; Supporting services; SWAT model
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119213

Grazing management is an important factor affecting the delivery of ecosystem services at the watershed scale. Moreover, characterizing the impacts of climate variation on water resources is essential in managing rangelands. In this study, the effects of alternative grazing management scenarios on provisioning, regulating, and supporting services were assessed in two watersheds with contrasting climates; the Lower Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River (LPDTFR) Watershed in North Texas and the Apple Watershed in South Dakota. The impacts of heavy stocking continuous grazing, light stocking continuous grazing, Adaptive Multi-Paddock (AMP) grazing, and an ungrazed exclosure were compared using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Our results indicate that the quantity of snow and timing of snow melt substantially influenced grazing management effects on ecosystem services in the Apple Watershed. In contrast, precipitation was the main factor influencing these effects in the LPDTFR Watershed because it highly affected the variation in water cycling, streamflow, sediment, and nutrient controls. Simulated results indicated that AMP grazing was the optimal grazing management approach for enhancing water conservation and ecosystem services in both watersheds regardless of climatic conditions. The Apple Watershed, which is a snow-dominated watershed, exhibited greater ecosystem service improvements under AMP grazing (50.6%, 58.7%, 74.4%, 61.5% and 72.6% reduction in surface runoff, streamflow, and sediment, total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) losses, respectively as compared to HC grazing) than the LPDTFR Watershed (46.0%, 22.8%, 34.1%, 18.9% and 38.4% reduction in surface runoff, streamflow, and sediment, TN and TP losses, respectively). Our results suggest that improved grazing management practices enhance ecosystem services and water catchment functions in rangeland-dominated areas, especially in colder climates. •Impacts of heavy continuous (HC), light continuous (LC) and adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing were assessed.•Grazing impacts on provisioning, regulating, and supporting ecosystem services were assessed in two watersheds.•The quantity of snow and timing of snow melt influenced grazing effects in the colder Apple Watershed in South Dakota.•Precipitation influenced grazing effects in the warmer Lower Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River Watershed in Texas.•Compared to HC, AMP grazing reduced streamflow, and sediment and nutrient losses by 23