Loading…
Fenton and Electro-Fenton Methods for Oxidation of H-Acid and Reactive Black 5
Oxidative treatment of H-acid (HA) and Reactive Black 5 (RB5) using Fenton reagent ( Fe2+ ∕ H2 O2 ) and the electro-Fenton (EF) method is reported. Optimization of doses of ferrous iron and hydrogen peroxide was carried out in each case using HA; and the oxidation of RB5 was also carried out under t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2006-03, Vol.132 (3), p.367-376 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Oxidative treatment of H-acid (HA) and Reactive Black 5 (RB5) using Fenton reagent
(
Fe2+
∕
H2
O2
)
and the electro-Fenton (EF) method is reported. Optimization of doses of ferrous iron and hydrogen peroxide was carried out in each case using HA; and the oxidation of RB5 was also carried out under the optimized conditions. Approximately 71% chemical oxygen demand (COD) was removed in 2 h using the conventional Fenton method at optimized doses:
Fe2+
=0.3
g∕L
(5.37 mM),
H2
O2
=6
mL∕L
(53.0 mM),
H2
O2
∕
Fe2+
=10
. In contrast, more than 92% COD was removed in 15 min using the EF method with an optimized
Fe2+
dose of
0.130
g∕L
(2.34 mM) and
8
ml∕L
(70.6 mM) of
H2
O2
. The pseudo-first-order rate constants
(k)
for the Fenton reagent and EF method were 0.054 and
0.38
min−1
. The COD removal through the EF method was seven times faster. The calculated energy requirement of the EF method was
0.82
kg
COD∕kW∙h
at the minimum applied current (0.25 A) when approximately 92.5% COD was removed. In the case of RB5, about 67 and 87% COD was removed under optimized Fenton and electro-Fenton conditions, respectively. The higher efficiency of the EF method was attributed to incremental addition of
Fe2+
and accompanying higher
H2
O2
∕
Fe2+
molar ratio. The results are discussed in the light of the mechanism for Fenton’s oxidation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-9372 1943-7870 |
DOI: | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:3(367) |