Management of metastatic bone disease of the pelvis: current concepts

Purpose Metastatic disease of the pelvis is frequently associated with severe pain and impaired ambulatory function. Depending on the patient’s characteristics, primary tumor, and metastatic pelvic disease, the treatment choice may be varied. This study aims to report on the current management optio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2024-08, Vol.50 (4), p.1277-1294
Main Authors: Çevik, Hüseyin Bilgehan, Ruggieri, Pietro, Giannoudis, Peter V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bone diseases
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
Bone Neoplasms - therapy
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Humans
Intensive
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Pelvic Bones
Pelvis
Review Article
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Traumatic Surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Metastatic disease of the pelvis is frequently associated with severe pain and impaired ambulatory function. Depending on the patient’s characteristics, primary tumor, and metastatic pelvic disease, the treatment choice may be varied. This study aims to report on the current management options of metastatic pelvic disease. Methods We comprehensively researched multiple databases and evaluated essential studies about current concepts of managing a metastatic bone disease of the pelvis, focusing on specific indications as well as on the result of treatment. Results Pelvic metastases not in the periacetabular region can be managed with modification of weight-bearing, analgesics, bisphosphonates, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Minimally invasive approaches include radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, embolization, percutaneous osteoplasty, and percutaneous screw placement. Pathological or impending periacetabular fracture, excessive periacetabular bone defect, radioresistant tumor, and persistent debilitating pain despite non-surgical treatment and/or minimally invasive procedures can be managed with different surgical techniques. Overall, treatment can be divided into nonoperative, minimally invasive, and operative based on specific indications, the expectations of the patient and the lesion. Conclusion Different treatment modalities exist to manage metastatic pelvic bone disease. Decision-making for the most appropriate treatment should be made with a multidisciplinary approach based on a case-by-case basis.
ISSN:1863-9933
1863-9941
1863-9941
DOI:10.1007/s00068-023-02382-x