Loading…
Evaluation of simple strategies to reduce the use of antibiotics in equine fresh sperm
According to the World Health Organization in 2021, the development of antimicrobial resistances is considered one of the top ten global public health threats. Microbial load negatively affects sperm quality and preservation (Ortega-Ferrusola and Peña, Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2009; 44(3):5...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of equine veterinary science 2023-06, Vol.125, p.104628, Article 104628 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | According to the World Health Organization in 2021, the development of antimicrobial resistances is considered one of the top ten global public health threats. Microbial load negatively affects sperm quality and preservation (Ortega-Ferrusola and Peña, Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2009; 44(3):518-522), which implies the use of antibiotics in semen extenders. The objective of this study was to study the effect of three semen processing techniques on quality and microbial load of fresh equine sperm to evaluate the possibility of reducing or eliminating the prophylactic use of antibiotics in the future. Ten adult stallions were included (one ejaculate per male). To avoid environmental contamination during sperm collection and processing, a protocol that maximizes hygiene measures was implemented. Aliquots of each ejaculate were processed following 4 protocols: Simple Centrifugation (450g x 7 min) in extender with antibiotics (SC+, as control group), Simple Centrifugation in extender without antibiotics (SC-), Single-Layer Colloidal Centrifugation (300g x 20 min) in extender without antibiotic (CC-) and Filtration (SpermFilter®) in extender without antibiotics (F-). Sperm motility (total and progressive motility, TM and PM, respectively, %), viability (Alives, %), and microbial load (on three different culture media (Columbia 5% Sheep Blood Agar, COS, general purpose medium for non-fastidious and fastidiousmicroorganisms, Sabouraud Dextrose Agar, SDA, for yeasts and molds, and Schaedler vitamin K1 5% Sheep Blood Agar, SCH, for fastidious anaerobic bacteria) were evaluated after processing. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA and post hoc tests (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0737-0806 1542-7412 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104628 |