Loading…

Platelet-rich plasma for treating dry eye disease - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dry eye disease has public health and economic significance. Platelet-rich plasma is rich in anti-inflammatory agents and growth factors, both beneficial for ocular surface repair. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the benefits of platelet-rich plasma for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contact lens & anterior eye 2024-02, Vol.47 (1), p.102091-102091, Article 102091
Main Authors: Kwaku Akowuah, Prince, Junior Obinwanne, Chukwuemeka, Owusu, Ebenezer, Kyeremeh, Sylvester, Bonsu, Kwaku, Karikari, Lucy Akua Afriyie, Akyaa Akomeah, Felicia, Kyei Nkansah, Ernest, Kobia-Acquah, Emmanuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dry eye disease has public health and economic significance. Platelet-rich plasma is rich in anti-inflammatory agents and growth factors, both beneficial for ocular surface repair. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the benefits of platelet-rich plasma for treating dry eye disease and its adverse effects. Prospective comparative studies using platelet-rich plasma as monotherapy for dry eye disease were included for efficacy assessment. Before-after studies were included for adverse events assessment. Data sources included PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022347982). PRISMA guidelines were followed. The National Health Institute (NIH) quality assessment tool for before-after studies, the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2), and the methodological index for non-randomized studies were used to assess the risk of bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. 19 studies (10 comparative and 9 before-after) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The occurrence rate of adverse effects was 2.6 % (95 % CI: 0.5 - 4.7). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for dry eye symptoms was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.25 - 1.37; I  = 82 %; p 
ISSN:1367-0484
1476-5411
DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2023.102091