A comparison of end‐of‐life care quality for Veterans receiving hospice in VA nursing homes and community nursing homes

• Published in: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2024-01, Vol.72 (1), p.59-68
• Main Authors: Wachterman, Melissa W., Smith, Dawn, Carpenter, Joan G., Griffin, Hillary L., Thorpe, Joshua, Feder, Shelli L., Hoelter, Jillian, Ersek, Mary, Shreve, Scott, Kutney‐Lee, Ann
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Community nursing; Electronic medical records; end‐of‐life; hospice; Hospice Care; Hospices; Humans; nursing home; Nursing Homes; Older people; quality; Quality of care; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Symptom management; Terminal Care - psychology; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans
• ISSN: 0002-8614; 1532-5415
• DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18606

Background While the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has long provided hospice care within VA community living centers (CLCs, i.e., VA nursing homes), an increasing number of Veterans are receiving hospice in VA‐contracted community nursing homes (CNHs). However, little data exist about the quality of end‐of‐life (EOL) care provided in CNHs. The aim of this study was to compare family ratings of the quality of EOL care provided to Veterans receiving hospice in VA CLCs and VA‐contracted CNHs. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of national data from VA's electronic medical record and Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) for Veterans who received hospice in VA CLCs or VA‐contracted CNHs between October 2021 and March 2022. The final sample included 1238 Veterans who died in either a CLC (n = 1012) or a CNH (n = 226) and whose next‐of‐kin completed the BFS. Our primary outcome was the BFS global rating of care received in the last 30 days of life. Secondary outcomes included BFS items related to symptom management, communication, emotional and spiritual support, and information about burial and survivor benefits. We compared unadjusted and adjusted proportions for all BFS outcomes between those who received hospice in CLCs and CNHs. Results The adjusted proportion of family members who gave the best possible rating (a score of 9 or 10 out of a possible 10) for the overall care received near EOL was more than 13 percentage points higher for Veterans who received hospice in VA CLCs compared to VA‐contracted CNHs. Our findings also revealed quality gaps of even greater magnitude in specific EOL care‐focused domains. Conclusions Our findings document inadequacies in the quality of multiple aspects of EOL care provided to Veterans in CNH‐based hospice and illuminate the urgent need for policy and practice interventions to improve this care.