Path integration, rather than being suppressed, is used to update spatial views in familiar environments with constantly available landmarks

• Published in: Cognition 2024-01, Vol.242, p.105662-105662, Article 105662
• Main Authors: Chen, Yue, Mou, Weimin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cues; Humans; Learning; Space Perception
• ISSN: 0010-0277; 1873-7838
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105662

This project tested three hypotheses conceptualizing the interaction between path integration based on self-motion and piloting based on landmarks in a familiar environment with persistent landmarks. The first hypothesis posits that path integration functions automatically, as in environments lacking persistent landmarks (environment-independent hypothesis). The second hypothesis suggests that persistent landmarks suppress path integration (suppression hypothesis). The third hypothesis proposes that path integration updates the spatial views of the environment (updating-spatial-views hypothesis). Participants learned a specific object's location. Subsequently, they undertook an outbound path originating from the object and then indicated the object's location (homing). In Experiments 1&1b, there were landmarks throughout the first 9 trials. On some later trials, the landmarks were presented during the outbound path but unexpectedly removed during homing (catch trials). On the last trials, there were no landmarks throughout (baseline trials). Experiments 2-3 were similar but added two identical objects (the original one and a rotated distractor) during homing on the catch and baseline trials. Experiment 4 replaced two identical objects with two groups of landmarks. The results showed that in Experiments 1&1b, homing angular error on the first catch trial was significantly larger than the matched baseline trial, undermining the environment-independent hypothesis. Conversely, in Experiment 2-4, the proportion of participants who recognized the original object or landmarks was similar between the first catch and the matched baseline trial, favoring the updating-spatial-views hypothesis over the suppression hypothesis. Therefore, while mismatches between updated spatial views and actual views of unexpected removal of landmarks impair homing performance, the updated spatial views help eliminate ambiguous targets or landmarks within the familiar environment.