Effectiveness of an eHealth‐Delivered Program to Empower People With Musculoskeletal Pain in Rural Australia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

• Published in: Arthritis care & research (2010) 2024-04, Vol.76 (4), p.570-581
• Main Authors: Mesa‐Castrillon, Carlos I., Simic, Milena, Ferreira, Manuela L., Bennell, Kim L., Luscombe, Georgina M., Gater, Kristy, Beckenkamp, Paula R., Michell, Antonio, Bauman, Adrian, Luca, Katie, Bunker, Stephen, Clavisi, Ornella, Ferreira, Paulo H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthritis; Back pain; Clinical trials; Exercise; Intervention; Knee; Low back pain; Osteoarthritis; Physical activity; Physical fitness; Physical training; Quality of life; Rural areas
• ISSN: 2151-464X; 2151-4658; 2151-4658
• DOI: 10.1002/acr.25272

Objective Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a three‐month physiotherapist‐delivered eHealth physical activity program compared with usual care to improve function in adults with low back pain or knee osteoarthritis in rural Australia. Methods This was a parallel, two‐group, pragmatic, superiority, randomized controlled trial involving three‐ and six‐month posttreatment follow‐ups. There was a total of 156 adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain (n = 97) or knee osteoarthritis (n = 59) from rural Australia. The intervention involved an eHealth physical activity and an exercise program that included five to eight teleconsultations with a physiotherapist (primary time point three months) or usual care (eg, general practitioner, physiotherapy, and pain medication). The primary outcome was the Patient‐Specific Functional Scale (0–30), with a three‐point difference between groups being considered the minimum clinically important difference. Results Participants receiving the eHealth intervention (n = 78) reported significantly greater and clinically worthwhile improvements in function (mean between‐group difference 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–5.9) compared to participants receiving usual care (n = 78). Small but statistically significantly greater improvements in disability (7.2 of 100; 95% CI 2.1–12.3) and quality of life (4.5 of 100; 95% CI 0.0–9.0) also favored the eHealth group. No clinical or statistical differences between groups were found for the secondary outcomes of pain, coping skills, and physical activity levels. Conclusion A physiotherapist‐delivered eHealth intervention is effective and provides clinically meaningful improvements in function compared to usual care for people with musculoskeletal pain in rural communities. These findings highlight the potential for eHealth‐based programs to improve access to evidence‐based exercise interventions for people with musculoskeletal pain in rural communities.