Pain in children with cerebral palsy as reported by parents

• Published in: Child : care, health & development health & development, 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.e13204-n/a
• Main Authors: Saleh, Maysoun Nimer, Almasri, Nihad Ali, Al Bakri, Basil
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age differences; Attention; Cerebral palsy; Cerebral Palsy - rehabilitation; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Cross-Sectional Studies; Developing countries; Female; Gender; GMFCS; Hips; Humans; Infant; Knees; LDCs; Male; Middle Aged; Motor ability; Pain; Pain management; Parents; Registries; registry; Rehabilitation; Stomach
• ISSN: 0305-1862; 1365-2214
• DOI: 10.1111/cch.13204

Background Pain in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is a problem that has not received adequate attention in developing countries. The aim of this study was to explore the presence of pain and common sites of pain in children with CP based on age, gender and ambulatory status as determined by the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study based on data from a CP registry (CPUP‐Jordan). Participants were 310 children with CP (mean age: 3.3 ± 2.9 years, range: 5 months to 15.9 years), 77.1% were below 5 years of age, 56.8% were boys and 49% were classified as Levels IV and V of the GMFCS. Parents were asked to indicate whether their child is currently experiencing pain (yes/no); if yes, they were asked to report the sites of pain. Results Seventy‐nine (25.5%) children experienced pain (34.1% had pain in the stomach, 15.2% at the hips and knees and 12.7% in their feet). The presence of pain did not significantly differ by age or gender. More children in GMFCS Levels V (34.7%) and IV (31.6%) experienced pain. Compared with Level V on the GMFCS (non‐ambulant children), children in Level I and children in Level III experienced less pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.087–0.727, p = 0.011; OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.18–0.98, p = 0.045, respectively). Pain sites differed with age and GMFCS. Conclusions Pain was reported to be less than previous studies. Non‐ambulant children experienced more pain. Pain monitoring and management should be a regular practice in rehabilitation for this population, with special attention for non‐ambulant children.