Biomedicine and the treatment of difference in a Jerusalem emergency department

• Published in: Social science & medicine (1982) 2023-12, Vol.339, p.116345-116345, Article 116345
• Main Authors: Orr, Zvika, Jackson, Levi, Alpert, Evan Avraham, Fleming, Mark D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arabs; Cultural Competency; Emergency department; Ethnic and racial minorities; Ethnicity; Humans; Israel; Jews; Minority groups; Religion; Social stigma
• ISSN: 0277-9536; 1873-5347
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116345

Biomedicine has played a key role in the dissemination of modern social norms, such as the emphasis on individual autonomy and the distinction between science and religion. This study examines the way the mostly-Jewish members of the medical staff at an emergency department of a Jerusalem hospital perceive Jewish ultra-Orthodox and Arab patients' behaviors vis-à-vis the existing biomedical norms. We analyzed participants' perceptions in terms of the social constructs they reveal, their meanings, and their implications. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 staff members and were analyzed using content analysis. The staff described challenges in treating Arab and ultra-Orthodox patients, which they related to both groups' embeddedness in traditional “cultures” and collective identities. According to the participants, in both cases, the patients' cultural affiliations constrained their sense of individual autonomy and rationality. However, in the comparative analysis, two differences emerged. First, while both groups were perceived to diverge from modern norms of individual autonomy, in the case of Arab patients, these characteristics were presented as disruptive and potentially threatening to the hospital staff. By contrast, in the case of ultra-Orthodox patients, adherence to traditional and collective values was more likely to be represented as a risk to the patient, rather than to the staff. Second, staff were more likely to provide accommodations for ultra-Orthodox patients than for Arab patients. These accommodations were often described in the frame of “cultural competency.” We suggest that divergences in how staff understood and responded to perceived cultural differences of each group reflect unequal impacts of structural determinants of health, including of political conflict. We recommend moving beyond the conceptual framework of cultural competency to strengthen the staff's structural competency, cultural and structural humility, and critical consciousness. •Arab and ultra-Orthodox Jewish populations are prominent minorities in Israel.•In the Emergency Department, each group is seen as diverging from norms of modernity.•Cultural competency is a dominant framework for accommodating difference.•Qualitative investigation found that cultural competency was applied unequally.•Structural competency and critical consciousness are recommended as alternatives.