Assessment of Consent Comprehension Among Kenyan Adolescents, Young Adults, and Parents: Comparison of Enhanced and Standard Consenting Procedures

• Published in: Journal of adolescent health 2024-03, Vol.74 (3), p.605-612
• Main Authors: Luseno, Winnie Kavulani, Iritani, Bonita J., Hartman, Shane, Odongo, Fredrick S., Otieno, Florence Anyango, Ongili, Barrack Otieno, Rennie, Stuart
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adolescents; Comprehension; Consent comprehension; Ethics; HIV; Humans; Informed Consent; Kenya; Parents; Sub-Saharan Africa; Young Adult; Young adults
• ISSN: 1054-139X; 1879-1972
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.10.009

Youth aged 15–19 years and parents of minors aged 15–17 years in sub-Saharan Africa are under-represented in empirical consent research. Thus, knowledge is limited concerning the adequacy of consent procedures and need for strategies to improve consent comprehension among these groups. We assessed comprehension following standard consent procedures and evaluated an enhanced procedure among Kenyan youth and parents. Participants were adolescents aged 15–17 years (n = 273), their parents (n = 196), and young adults aged 18–19 years (n = 196). We used a quasi-experimental cohort design to implement standard and enhanced (single condition: extended discussion, test/feedback) consent procedures. Participants completed a 21-item informed consent comprehension assessment instrument. After standard consent procedures, mean comprehension scores were 11.36, 13.64, and 13.43 (score range: 0–21) among adolescents, young adults, and parents, respectively. About 6.2% of adolescents, 19.6% of young adults, and 21.4% of parents answered ≥ 80% of the questions correctly. After the enhanced procedures, comprehension scores (15.87 adolescents, 17.81 young adults, and 16.77 parents) and proportions answering ≥ 80% of the questions correctly (44.9% adolescents, 76.8% young adults, and 64.3% parents) increased significantly. Regression analysis indicated statistically significant differences (p < .001) in comprehension scores between the enhanced and standard groups (β = 3.87 adolescents, β = 4.03 young adults, and β = 3.60 parents) after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Enhancing consent procedures with extended discussions, quizzes, and additional explanation where understanding is inadequate is a promising approach for improving comprehension. However, poorer comprehension among adolescents compared to young adults and parents underscores the need for research to identify additional approaches to improve understanding.